Bamboo
Prince Diamond
 |
| Gold Mouse |
 |
| Weird Mouse |
 |
| Blue Eye Mouse |
 |
| Mechanical mouse |
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
The Robot Store
Carlo Bertocchini is SFRSA's most awarded competition robot builder. His amazing heavyweight robot, Biohazard, triumphed once again! Not only did the sleek R/C robot win the one-to-one heavyweight championship at BattleBots (the show is on Comedy Central (where it belongs), Biohazard won "Best Engineered" by peer vote.
Carlo also runs the Robot Books web site, which features a wide selection of just the books and magazines robot builders need! Forget about Amazon.com!. This site is brimming with resources from robot club links to toys! Check it out!
The Robot Store
Run by SFRSA's former president, Roger Gilbertson, Mondo-tronics' Robot Store Web Catalog features over 400 robot kits, books, and software, as well as Muscle Wires® shape memory alloys, and lots of other great robot related hardware, electronics, video tapes and more!
The Robot Store is a sponsor of the SFRSA Sumo Robot competetions and the Robot Games!
SIGHTech
Former SFRSA president Brad Smallridge has been busy with his company, SIGHTech. Brad's machine vision systems are easy to use and can learn objects/images in a few minutes by just looking at them through a camera -- no programming of the system is required!! These sight systems are invaluable in industrial process inspection stations.
Carlo also runs the Robot Books web site, which features a wide selection of just the books and magazines robot builders need! Forget about Amazon.com!. This site is brimming with resources from robot club links to toys! Check it out!
The Robot Store
Run by SFRSA's former president, Roger Gilbertson, Mondo-tronics' Robot Store Web Catalog features over 400 robot kits, books, and software, as well as Muscle Wires® shape memory alloys, and lots of other great robot related hardware, electronics, video tapes and more!
The Robot Store is a sponsor of the SFRSA Sumo Robot competetions and the Robot Games!
SIGHTech
Former SFRSA president Brad Smallridge has been busy with his company, SIGHTech. Brad's machine vision systems are easy to use and can learn objects/images in a few minutes by just looking at them through a camera -- no programming of the system is required!! These sight systems are invaluable in industrial process inspection stations.
Cabaret Mechanical Theatre
"...Autonomous, untethered, embodied agent...vehicular robot to test an embodied agent controller theorized by Alan Turing...The agent, an artificial rodent, utilized the instantiation of a “single-track” P-Type Turing machine as an Engine of Intelligence...The device can be seen at: http://www.maelzel.com/DARYL/R_Model.htm" ("De tail")
Looking to build an untethered, autonomous, vehicular robot, perhaps to test an embodied agent controller theorized by Alan Turing? Need someone into Adaptive and Embedded Artificial Intelligence, applied mobile robotics, hardware based adaptive systems, and high-speed computer design? Ovi Chris Rouly's your man - he's looking for work and currently available. Here's his contact info.
Gibson, David's
Sony AIBO
Gibson belongs to SFRSA's president-elect, Dave Calkins. Though Dave has hacked Gibson's brain, this Aibo is a very mild-mannered office dogbot, usually awake for 4-6 hours a day.
Gibson even has his own homepag
Looking to build an untethered, autonomous, vehicular robot, perhaps to test an embodied agent controller theorized by Alan Turing? Need someone into Adaptive and Embedded Artificial Intelligence, applied mobile robotics, hardware based adaptive systems, and high-speed computer design? Ovi Chris Rouly's your man - he's looking for work and currently available. Here's his contact info.
Gibson, David's
Sony AIBO
Gibson belongs to SFRSA's president-elect, Dave Calkins. Though Dave has hacked Gibson's brain, this Aibo is a very mild-mannered office dogbot, usually awake for 4-6 hours a day.
Gibson even has his own homepag
Cabaret Mechanical Theatre
offers kits for making Automata & a website featuring Virtual Reality animations of the creations. SFRSA Mediameister Cliff Thompson purchased a set of kits & instructional books for his Dad, "The Original Engineer" (TOE), a few Xmas's back. A recent video of his latest creations would tend to indicate that TOE has become one of, if not the, World's Greatest Automatist, as shown in a brief clip (This is a Quicktime mov file. You may need to right-click & download to view it.).
Zach's Cool Stuff SFRSA member & Lawrence Berkeley Lab Engineer Zach Radding is building a Robot Workshop n Berkeley amd has created a website called Zach's Cool Stuff. A descriptive excerpt from the web page reads " Where High school and college-aged members expand their knowledge of electronics, robotics, mechanic s and computers through hands-on projects".
Zach's Cool Stuff SFRSA member & Lawrence Berkeley Lab Engineer Zach Radding is building a Robot Workshop n Berkeley amd has created a website called Zach's Cool Stuff. A descriptive excerpt from the web page reads " Where High school and college-aged members expand their knowledge of electronics, robotics, mechanic s and computers through hands-on projects".
offers kits for making Automata & a website featuring Virtual Reality animations of the creations. SFRSA Mediameister Cliff Thompson purchased a set of kits & instructional books for his Dad, "The Original Engineer" (TOE), a few Xmas's back. A recent video of his latest creations would tend to indicate that TOE has become one of, if not the, World's Greatest Automatist, as shown in a brief clip (This is a Quicktime mov file. You may need to right-click & download to view it.).
Zach's Cool Stuff SFRSA member & Lawrence Berkeley Lab Engineer Zach Radding is building a Robot Workshop n Berkeley amd has created a website called Zach's Cool Stuff. A descriptive excerpt from the web page reads " Where High school and college-aged members expand their knowledge of electronics, robotics, mechanic s and computers through hands-on projects".
Zach's Cool Stuff SFRSA member & Lawrence Berkeley Lab Engineer Zach Radding is building a Robot Workshop n Berkeley amd has created a website called Zach's Cool Stuff. A descriptive excerpt from the web page reads " Where High school and college-aged members expand their knowledge of electronics, robotics, mechanic s and computers through hands-on projects".
Run by SFRSA's former president, Roger Gilbertson, Mondo-tronics' Robot Store Web Catalog features over 400 robot kits, books, and software, as well as Muscle Wires® shape memory alloys, and lots of other great robot related hardware, electronics, video tapes and more!
The Robot Store is a sponsor of the SFRSA Sumo Robot competetions and the Robot Games!
SIGHTech
Former SFRSA president Brad Smallridge has been busy with his company, SIGHTech. Brad's machine vision systems are easy to use and can learn objects/images in a few minutes by just looking at them through a camera -- no programming of the system is required!! These sight systems are invaluable in industrial process inspection stations.
The Robot Store is a sponsor of the SFRSA Sumo Robot competetions and the Robot Games!
SIGHTech
Former SFRSA president Brad Smallridge has been busy with his company, SIGHTech. Brad's machine vision systems are easy to use and can learn objects/images in a few minutes by just looking at them through a camera -- no programming of the system is required!! These sight systems are invaluable in industrial process inspection stations.
Other References Offline
Robot Competitions Over the Years: A Retrospective. AI Magazine 23:1 (Spring 2002).
Bonasso, Pete and Thomas Dean. 1997. A Retrospective of the AAAI Robot Competitions. AI Magazine 18 (1): 11-23. "This article is the content of an invited talk given by the authors at the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96). The piece begins with a short history of the competition, then discusses the technical challenges and the political and cultural issues associated with bringing it off every year. We also cover the science and engineering involved with the robot tasks and the educational and commercial aspects of the competition. We finish with a discussion of the community formed by the organizers, participants, and the conference attendees."
Britton, Peter. 1995. Undersea Explorers. Popular Science 246 (May 1995): 39-42.
Buhmann, Joachim, et. al. 1995. The Mobile Robot Rhino. AI Magazine 16 (2): 31-38. Rhino was the University of Bonn's entry in the 1994 AAAI Robot Competition. Rhino is a mobile robot designed for indoor navigation and manipulation tasks. The general scientific goal of the rhino project is development and analysis of autonomous and complex learning systems. This article describes major components of the rhino control software, sketches the basic philosophy of the rhino architecture and discusses lessons learned at the competition.
Canny, J. F. 1988. The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clarke, Roger. 1994. Asimov's Laws for Robotics: Implications for Information Technology. Parts 1 and 2. Computer(December 1993 (pp. 53-61), and January 1994 (pp. 57-65).
Domaine, Helen. 2005. Robotics. Lerner Publications.
This book, recommended for students in grades 4 - 6, was reviewed by:
School Library Journal (December 1, 2005)
American Library Association (September 1, 2005)
Earnest, Les. 2005. The Stanford Cart. "The Stanford Cart was born as a research platform for studying the problem of controlling a Moon rover from Earth. It then was reconfigured as a robot vehicle for research in visual navigation, then went into show business for a few years at the Computer Museum in Boston. It now resides in a home for retired robots at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California."
Engelberger, J. F. 1989. Robotics in Service. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Engelberger, J. F. 1980. Robotics in Practice. New York: Amacom.
Fikes, R., P. Hart, and N. Nilsson. 1972. Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans. Artificial Intelligence 3: 1-4.
Goldsmith, Mike. Record entries for science prize. By Christine McGourty. BBC News (May 10, 2004). "The Aventis Prize is worth £10,000 to the winner and guarantees a sales rush. The prize, which includes a junior category, is managed by the UK's science academy, the Royal Society. ... The shortlisted books for the 2004 Junior Prize: ... Riotous Robots, by Mike Goldsmith (Scholastic Children's Books ) - In brief: From Frankenstein to nanobots, this is a comprehensive and entertaining guide to the history and future of robots. It explains the technical detail of how robots work in an accessible way.
Grepo, Stephanie V. 1996. Robot Ant-ics. Technology Review 99: 13-14.
Hinkle, David, David Kortenkamp, and David Miller 1996. The 1995 Robot Competition and Exhibition. AI Magazine 17 (1): 31-45.
Horn, B. K. P. 1986. Robot Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jones, Joseph, Anita Flynn, and Bruce Seiger. 1999. Mobile Robots: Inspiration to Implementation. 2nd edition. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
Kanade, Takeo, Michael Reed, and Lee E. Weiss. 1994. New Technologies and Applications in Robotics. Communications of the ACM 37 (3): 58-76.
Konolige, Kurt. 1995. ERRATIC Competes with the Big Boys. AI Magazine 16 (2): 61-67. This article discusses the development of the robot ERRATIC, the second-place winner of the 1994 AAAI Robot Competition. The perceptual and control architecture is described, as well as the robot's performance during the competition.
Kortenkamp, David, R. Peter Bonasso, and Robin Murphy, editors. 1998. Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots: Case Studies of Successful Robot Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. These case studies describe robots that have "left the lab" and been tested in the field. Includes descriptions of important algorithms and pseudo-code, and covers themes of navigation, mapping, vision, and architecture.
Lederman, Susan J. and Roberta L. Klatzky. 1994. The Intelligent Hand: An Experimental Approach to Human Object Recognition and Implications for Robotics and AI. AI Magazine 15 (1): 26-38. The scientific study of biological systems offers a complementary approach to more formal analytic methods favored by roboticists.
Leroux, P. editor, 1999. Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 1080-1089. Proceedings of the workshop at AIED 99.
McDermott, Drew. 1992. Robot Planning. AI Magazine 13 (2): 55-79. "There are several strands of research in the field; I survey six: (1) attempts to avoid planning; (2) the design of flexible plan notations; (3) theories of time-constrained planning; (4) planning by projecting and repairing faulty plans; (5) motion planning; and (6) the learning of optimal behaviors from reinforcements."
Moran, Barbara, and Laura Van Dam. 1996. Robots on all Twos. Technology Review 99: 10-11.
Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. A lively and accessible overview of the field of robotics from the director of the Mobile Robot Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon University. The book covers historical development as well as social issues.
Murphy, Robin R. 2000. An Introduction to AI Robotics. MIT Press. "This text covers all the material needed to understand the principles behind the AI approach to robotics and to program an artificially intelligent robot for applications involving sensing, navigation, planning, and uncertainty. Robin Murphy is extremely effective at combining theoretical and practical rigor with a light narrative touch. In the overview, for example, she touches upon anthropomorphic robots from classic films and science fiction stories before delving into the nuts and bolts of organizing intelligence in robots. "
Nadis, Steven J. 1995. Fantastic Voyage. Omni 17 (January 1995): 9.
Nadis, Steven J., and Jerry Shine. 1996. Go Team, Go. Popular Science 248 (May 1996): 40.
Normile, Dennis. 1997. RoboCup Soccer Match is a Challenge for Silicon Rookies. Science 277 (September 26, 1997): 1933.
Nourbakhsh, Illah, Bob Powers, and Stan Birchfield. 1995. DERVISH: An Office Navigating Robot. AI Magazine 16 (2): 53-60. DERVISH won the Office Delivery event of the 1994 Robot Competition and Exhibition. Although the contest required DERVISH to navigate in an artificial office environment, the goal of the contest was to push the technology of robot navigation in real office buildings with minimal domain information. DERVISH navigates reliably using retractable assumptions that simplify the planning problem.
Pomerleau, D. 1993. Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Poole, David, Alan Mackworth, and Randy Goebels. 1998. Building Situated Robots. In Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach, 443-460. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. 2002. Robotics. In Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Second Edition).
Ryder, Graham. 1996. Humans and Robots in the Geological Exploration of Planets. Ad Astra 8 (Nov/Dec 1996): 20-1.
Spice, Byron 1997. Look, No Hands: CMU Automotive Robot is Now Able to Control a Car on the Highway. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 30, 1997: Science & Environment, A6+.
Stone, Brad. 1997. Actually, Chess is Easy. Newsweek 129 (May 5, 1997): 53. Discusses robot competitions in the fields of navigation, aviation, and soccer.
Suplee, Curt. 1997. Robot Revolution. National Geographic 192 (July 1997): 76-95.
Thomson, Alan J. 1995. Object-Oriented Blowfly: A Study in Computational Neuroethology. AI Applications 9 (2): 15-25.
Thrun, Sebastian. 1997. To Know or Not to Know: On the Utility of Models in Mobile Robots. AI Magazine 18 (1): 47-54.
Yoshikawa, T. 1990. Foundations of Robotics: Analysis and Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tags: robotics
Bonasso, Pete and Thomas Dean. 1997. A Retrospective of the AAAI Robot Competitions. AI Magazine 18 (1): 11-23. "This article is the content of an invited talk given by the authors at the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96). The piece begins with a short history of the competition, then discusses the technical challenges and the political and cultural issues associated with bringing it off every year. We also cover the science and engineering involved with the robot tasks and the educational and commercial aspects of the competition. We finish with a discussion of the community formed by the organizers, participants, and the conference attendees."
Britton, Peter. 1995. Undersea Explorers. Popular Science 246 (May 1995): 39-42.
Buhmann, Joachim, et. al. 1995. The Mobile Robot Rhino. AI Magazine 16 (2): 31-38. Rhino was the University of Bonn's entry in the 1994 AAAI Robot Competition. Rhino is a mobile robot designed for indoor navigation and manipulation tasks. The general scientific goal of the rhino project is development and analysis of autonomous and complex learning systems. This article describes major components of the rhino control software, sketches the basic philosophy of the rhino architecture and discusses lessons learned at the competition.
Canny, J. F. 1988. The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clarke, Roger. 1994. Asimov's Laws for Robotics: Implications for Information Technology. Parts 1 and 2. Computer(December 1993 (pp. 53-61), and January 1994 (pp. 57-65).
Domaine, Helen. 2005. Robotics. Lerner Publications.
This book, recommended for students in grades 4 - 6, was reviewed by:
School Library Journal (December 1, 2005)
American Library Association (September 1, 2005)
Earnest, Les. 2005. The Stanford Cart. "The Stanford Cart was born as a research platform for studying the problem of controlling a Moon rover from Earth. It then was reconfigured as a robot vehicle for research in visual navigation, then went into show business for a few years at the Computer Museum in Boston. It now resides in a home for retired robots at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California."
Engelberger, J. F. 1989. Robotics in Service. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Engelberger, J. F. 1980. Robotics in Practice. New York: Amacom.
Fikes, R., P. Hart, and N. Nilsson. 1972. Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans. Artificial Intelligence 3: 1-4.
Goldsmith, Mike. Record entries for science prize. By Christine McGourty. BBC News (May 10, 2004). "The Aventis Prize is worth £10,000 to the winner and guarantees a sales rush. The prize, which includes a junior category, is managed by the UK's science academy, the Royal Society. ... The shortlisted books for the 2004 Junior Prize: ... Riotous Robots, by Mike Goldsmith (Scholastic Children's Books ) - In brief: From Frankenstein to nanobots, this is a comprehensive and entertaining guide to the history and future of robots. It explains the technical detail of how robots work in an accessible way.
Grepo, Stephanie V. 1996. Robot Ant-ics. Technology Review 99: 13-14.
Hinkle, David, David Kortenkamp, and David Miller 1996. The 1995 Robot Competition and Exhibition. AI Magazine 17 (1): 31-45.
Horn, B. K. P. 1986. Robot Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jones, Joseph, Anita Flynn, and Bruce Seiger. 1999. Mobile Robots: Inspiration to Implementation. 2nd edition. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
Kanade, Takeo, Michael Reed, and Lee E. Weiss. 1994. New Technologies and Applications in Robotics. Communications of the ACM 37 (3): 58-76.
Konolige, Kurt. 1995. ERRATIC Competes with the Big Boys. AI Magazine 16 (2): 61-67. This article discusses the development of the robot ERRATIC, the second-place winner of the 1994 AAAI Robot Competition. The perceptual and control architecture is described, as well as the robot's performance during the competition.
Kortenkamp, David, R. Peter Bonasso, and Robin Murphy, editors. 1998. Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots: Case Studies of Successful Robot Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. These case studies describe robots that have "left the lab" and been tested in the field. Includes descriptions of important algorithms and pseudo-code, and covers themes of navigation, mapping, vision, and architecture.
Lederman, Susan J. and Roberta L. Klatzky. 1994. The Intelligent Hand: An Experimental Approach to Human Object Recognition and Implications for Robotics and AI. AI Magazine 15 (1): 26-38. The scientific study of biological systems offers a complementary approach to more formal analytic methods favored by roboticists.
Leroux, P. editor, 1999. Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 1080-1089. Proceedings of the workshop at AIED 99.
McDermott, Drew. 1992. Robot Planning. AI Magazine 13 (2): 55-79. "There are several strands of research in the field; I survey six: (1) attempts to avoid planning; (2) the design of flexible plan notations; (3) theories of time-constrained planning; (4) planning by projecting and repairing faulty plans; (5) motion planning; and (6) the learning of optimal behaviors from reinforcements."
Moran, Barbara, and Laura Van Dam. 1996. Robots on all Twos. Technology Review 99: 10-11.
Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. A lively and accessible overview of the field of robotics from the director of the Mobile Robot Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon University. The book covers historical development as well as social issues.
Murphy, Robin R. 2000. An Introduction to AI Robotics. MIT Press. "This text covers all the material needed to understand the principles behind the AI approach to robotics and to program an artificially intelligent robot for applications involving sensing, navigation, planning, and uncertainty. Robin Murphy is extremely effective at combining theoretical and practical rigor with a light narrative touch. In the overview, for example, she touches upon anthropomorphic robots from classic films and science fiction stories before delving into the nuts and bolts of organizing intelligence in robots. "
Nadis, Steven J. 1995. Fantastic Voyage. Omni 17 (January 1995): 9.
Nadis, Steven J., and Jerry Shine. 1996. Go Team, Go. Popular Science 248 (May 1996): 40.
Normile, Dennis. 1997. RoboCup Soccer Match is a Challenge for Silicon Rookies. Science 277 (September 26, 1997): 1933.
Nourbakhsh, Illah, Bob Powers, and Stan Birchfield. 1995. DERVISH: An Office Navigating Robot. AI Magazine 16 (2): 53-60. DERVISH won the Office Delivery event of the 1994 Robot Competition and Exhibition. Although the contest required DERVISH to navigate in an artificial office environment, the goal of the contest was to push the technology of robot navigation in real office buildings with minimal domain information. DERVISH navigates reliably using retractable assumptions that simplify the planning problem.
Pomerleau, D. 1993. Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Poole, David, Alan Mackworth, and Randy Goebels. 1998. Building Situated Robots. In Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach, 443-460. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. 2002. Robotics. In Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Second Edition).
Ryder, Graham. 1996. Humans and Robots in the Geological Exploration of Planets. Ad Astra 8 (Nov/Dec 1996): 20-1.
Spice, Byron 1997. Look, No Hands: CMU Automotive Robot is Now Able to Control a Car on the Highway. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 30, 1997: Science & Environment, A6+.
Stone, Brad. 1997. Actually, Chess is Easy. Newsweek 129 (May 5, 1997): 53. Discusses robot competitions in the fields of navigation, aviation, and soccer.
Suplee, Curt. 1997. Robot Revolution. National Geographic 192 (July 1997): 76-95.
Thomson, Alan J. 1995. Object-Oriented Blowfly: A Study in Computational Neuroethology. AI Applications 9 (2): 15-25.
Thrun, Sebastian. 1997. To Know or Not to Know: On the Utility of Models in Mobile Robots. AI Magazine 18 (1): 47-54.
Yoshikawa, T. 1990. Foundations of Robotics: Analysis and Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tags: robotics
Related Resources
"BEST is a non-profit, volunteer-based organization whose mission is to inspire students to pursue careers in engineering, science, and technology through participation in a sports-like, science and engineering-based robotics competition."
"Botball is a hands-on learning experience in robotics designed to engage students in learning the practical applications of science, technology, engineering and math." As explained on the About Botball page: "Presented in your region by KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, the Botball Educational Robotics Program integrates science, technology, engineering and math with robotics to keep your students on the forefront of technology. Any middle or high school aged student can participate in Botball as long as the team has an adult contact. The organization of the team is up to the team leader."
Be sure to check out the [AITopics/Software#robotcode | robot products and programming tutorial]], and see what's happening at their National Conference on Educational Robotics.
And check out this Robotics and Engineering Course (available online from NASA's Robotics Alliance Project): Robotics with the XBC Controller. Instructor: David Culp (August 8 - September 7, 2006). "An introduction to key robotics and engineering concepts by utilizing a hands-on and project based approach to learning. Students will explore autonomous mobile robotic systems using advanced robotics hardware and software from the KISS Institute for Practical Robotics."
Eurobot: "An amazing event gathering fun, high technology, friendship, creativity, education and passion! Created in 1998, Eurobot is a international amateur robotics contest open to teams of young people, organised either in student projects or in independent clubs. Eurobot takes place in Europe but also welcomes countries from other continents."
"FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) is a multinational non-profit organization, that aspires to transform culture, making science, math, engineering, and technology as cool for kids as sports are today." "The FIRST LEGO League (FLL), considered the 'little league' of the FIRST Robotics Competition, is the result of a partnership between FIRST and the LEGO Group. FLL extends the FIRST concept of inspiring and celebrating science and technology to children aged 9 through 14, using real-world context and hands-on experimentation."
"The FIRST Robotics Competition is an exciting, multinational competition that teams professionals and young people to solve an engineering design problem in an intense and competitive way. The program is a life-changing, career-molding experienceóand a lot of fun. In 2005 the competition will reach close to 25,000 high-school-aged young people on close to 1,000 teams in 30 competitions. Our teams come from Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Israel, Mexico, the U.K., and almost every U.S. state."
Grand Challenges: several in our collection involve robots!
RoboCup: "an international joint project to promote AI, robotics, and related field. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined. RoboCup chose to use soccer game as a central topic of research, aiming at innovations to be applied for socially significant problems and industries. The ultimate goal of the RoboCup project is By 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world champion team in soccer."
Also see RoboCup-Rescue on our Hazards & Disasters page, and this article:
RoboCup Rescue: A Grand Challenge for Multiagent and Intelligent Systems. By Hiroaki Kitano and Satoshi Tadokoro. AI Magazine 22(1): Spring 2001, 39-52. "Disaster rescue is one of the most serious social issues that involves very large numbers of heterogeneous agents in the hostile environment. The intention of the RoboCup Rescue project is to promote research and development in this socially significant domain at various levels, involving multiagent teamwork coordination, physical agents for search and rescue, information infrastructures, personal digital assistants, a standard simulator and decision-support systems, evaluation benchmarks for rescue strategies, and robotic systems that are all integrated into a comprehensive system in the future. ... In this article, we present a detailed analysis of the task domain and elucidate characteristics necessary for multiagent and intelligent systems for this domain. Then, we present an overview of the RoboCup Rescue project."
Historical note: "The idea of robots playing soccer was first mentioned by Professor Alan Mackworth (University of British Columbia, Canada) in a paper entitled 'On Seeing Robots' presented at VI-92, 1992. and later published in a book Computer Vision: System, Theory, and Applications, pages 1-13, World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1993. A series of papers on the Dynamo robot soccer project was published by his group. Independently, a group of Japanese researchers organized a Workshop on Grand Challenges in Artificial Intelligence in October, 1992 in Tokyo, discussing possible grand challenge problems. This workshop led to a serious discussions of using the game of soccer for promoting science and technology." - from A Brief History of RoboCup.
And be sure to watch Dynamos and Dynamites - The World's First Soccer Playing Robots, a collection of videos on Professor Alan Mackworth's Robot Soccer page.
Articles:
RoboCup. AI Magazine 21 (1), Spring 2000. Among the many articles you'll find in this exciting issue are: Overview of RoboCup-98 (Minoru Asada, Manuela M. Veloso, Milind Tambe, Itsuki Noda, Hiroaki Kitano, and Gerhard K. Kraetzschmar), AAAI-98 Robot Exhibition (Karen Zita Haigh and Tucker Balch), and Using Robot Competitions to Promote Intellectual Development (Robin R. Murphy)
The AAAI 2006 Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition. By Paul E. Rybski, Jeffrey Forbes, Debra Burhans, Zach Dodds, Paul Oh, Matthias Scheutz, and Bob Avanzato. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 101.
RoboCup: 10 Years of Achievements and Future Challenges. By Ubbo Visser and Hans-Dieter Burkhard. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 115. "Will we see autonomous humanoid robots that play (and win) soccer against the human soccer world champion in the year 2050? This question is not easy to answer, and the idea is quite visionary. However, this is the goal of the RoboCup Federation. There are serious research questions that have to be tackled behind the scenes of a soccer game: perception, decision making, action selection, hardware design, materials, energy, and more. RoboCup is also about the nature of intelligence, and playing soccer acts as a performance measure of systems that contain artificial intelligence in much the same way chess has been used over the last century. This article outlines the current situation following 10 years of research with reference to the results of the 2006 World Championship in Bremen, Germany, and discusses future challenges."
See More Readings below and AI Magazine and for more articles about RoboCup and other competitions.
"RoboFesta – Europe is part of an international movement to promote interest throughout Europe in science and technology through many different kinds of robotics activities. These include many exciting robot competitions for children and adults, expositions, technical meetings, and widespread media cover. RoboFesta began in Japan in 1999, and is rapidly spreading throughout the world."
RoboFesta-UK
RoboFesta-France
Additional countries and lots of resources can be found by using the links on any of the RoboFesta pages mentioned above.
Sodarace [a joint venture between: soda and Queen Mary, University of London]: "the online olympics pitting human creativity against machine learning in a competition to construct virtual racing robots. ... Sodarace is not just for fun. It is a shared competition for Artificial Intelligence researchers to test their learning algorithms while also being a play space in which to communicate the benefits of Artificial Intelligence research with a wide audience and promote a creative exploration of physics and engineering."
Also see:
AI in the news
Robot Competitions Over the Years: A Retrospective. AI Magazine 23:1 (Spring 2002).
Robot Competition Links from RobotBooks.com
Statistics
The International Federation of Robotics
Robotics Online, from The Robotic Industries Association, offers an assortment of very helpful resources including current news articles and Robotics Industry Statistics.
Our collection of Robotics Statistics
"Botball is a hands-on learning experience in robotics designed to engage students in learning the practical applications of science, technology, engineering and math." As explained on the About Botball page: "Presented in your region by KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, the Botball Educational Robotics Program integrates science, technology, engineering and math with robotics to keep your students on the forefront of technology. Any middle or high school aged student can participate in Botball as long as the team has an adult contact. The organization of the team is up to the team leader."
Be sure to check out the [AITopics/Software#robotcode | robot products and programming tutorial]], and see what's happening at their National Conference on Educational Robotics.
And check out this Robotics and Engineering Course (available online from NASA's Robotics Alliance Project): Robotics with the XBC Controller. Instructor: David Culp (August 8 - September 7, 2006). "An introduction to key robotics and engineering concepts by utilizing a hands-on and project based approach to learning. Students will explore autonomous mobile robotic systems using advanced robotics hardware and software from the KISS Institute for Practical Robotics."
Eurobot: "An amazing event gathering fun, high technology, friendship, creativity, education and passion! Created in 1998, Eurobot is a international amateur robotics contest open to teams of young people, organised either in student projects or in independent clubs. Eurobot takes place in Europe but also welcomes countries from other continents."
"FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) is a multinational non-profit organization, that aspires to transform culture, making science, math, engineering, and technology as cool for kids as sports are today." "The FIRST LEGO League (FLL), considered the 'little league' of the FIRST Robotics Competition, is the result of a partnership between FIRST and the LEGO Group. FLL extends the FIRST concept of inspiring and celebrating science and technology to children aged 9 through 14, using real-world context and hands-on experimentation."
"The FIRST Robotics Competition is an exciting, multinational competition that teams professionals and young people to solve an engineering design problem in an intense and competitive way. The program is a life-changing, career-molding experienceóand a lot of fun. In 2005 the competition will reach close to 25,000 high-school-aged young people on close to 1,000 teams in 30 competitions. Our teams come from Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Israel, Mexico, the U.K., and almost every U.S. state."
Grand Challenges: several in our collection involve robots!
RoboCup: "an international joint project to promote AI, robotics, and related field. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined. RoboCup chose to use soccer game as a central topic of research, aiming at innovations to be applied for socially significant problems and industries. The ultimate goal of the RoboCup project is By 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world champion team in soccer."
Also see RoboCup-Rescue on our Hazards & Disasters page, and this article:
RoboCup Rescue: A Grand Challenge for Multiagent and Intelligent Systems. By Hiroaki Kitano and Satoshi Tadokoro. AI Magazine 22(1): Spring 2001, 39-52. "Disaster rescue is one of the most serious social issues that involves very large numbers of heterogeneous agents in the hostile environment. The intention of the RoboCup Rescue project is to promote research and development in this socially significant domain at various levels, involving multiagent teamwork coordination, physical agents for search and rescue, information infrastructures, personal digital assistants, a standard simulator and decision-support systems, evaluation benchmarks for rescue strategies, and robotic systems that are all integrated into a comprehensive system in the future. ... In this article, we present a detailed analysis of the task domain and elucidate characteristics necessary for multiagent and intelligent systems for this domain. Then, we present an overview of the RoboCup Rescue project."
Historical note: "The idea of robots playing soccer was first mentioned by Professor Alan Mackworth (University of British Columbia, Canada) in a paper entitled 'On Seeing Robots' presented at VI-92, 1992. and later published in a book Computer Vision: System, Theory, and Applications, pages 1-13, World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1993. A series of papers on the Dynamo robot soccer project was published by his group. Independently, a group of Japanese researchers organized a Workshop on Grand Challenges in Artificial Intelligence in October, 1992 in Tokyo, discussing possible grand challenge problems. This workshop led to a serious discussions of using the game of soccer for promoting science and technology." - from A Brief History of RoboCup.
And be sure to watch Dynamos and Dynamites - The World's First Soccer Playing Robots, a collection of videos on Professor Alan Mackworth's Robot Soccer page.
Articles:
RoboCup. AI Magazine 21 (1), Spring 2000. Among the many articles you'll find in this exciting issue are: Overview of RoboCup-98 (Minoru Asada, Manuela M. Veloso, Milind Tambe, Itsuki Noda, Hiroaki Kitano, and Gerhard K. Kraetzschmar), AAAI-98 Robot Exhibition (Karen Zita Haigh and Tucker Balch), and Using Robot Competitions to Promote Intellectual Development (Robin R. Murphy)
The AAAI 2006 Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition. By Paul E. Rybski, Jeffrey Forbes, Debra Burhans, Zach Dodds, Paul Oh, Matthias Scheutz, and Bob Avanzato. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 101.
RoboCup: 10 Years of Achievements and Future Challenges. By Ubbo Visser and Hans-Dieter Burkhard. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 115. "Will we see autonomous humanoid robots that play (and win) soccer against the human soccer world champion in the year 2050? This question is not easy to answer, and the idea is quite visionary. However, this is the goal of the RoboCup Federation. There are serious research questions that have to be tackled behind the scenes of a soccer game: perception, decision making, action selection, hardware design, materials, energy, and more. RoboCup is also about the nature of intelligence, and playing soccer acts as a performance measure of systems that contain artificial intelligence in much the same way chess has been used over the last century. This article outlines the current situation following 10 years of research with reference to the results of the 2006 World Championship in Bremen, Germany, and discusses future challenges."
See More Readings below and AI Magazine and for more articles about RoboCup and other competitions.
"RoboFesta – Europe is part of an international movement to promote interest throughout Europe in science and technology through many different kinds of robotics activities. These include many exciting robot competitions for children and adults, expositions, technical meetings, and widespread media cover. RoboFesta began in Japan in 1999, and is rapidly spreading throughout the world."
RoboFesta-UK
RoboFesta-France
Additional countries and lots of resources can be found by using the links on any of the RoboFesta pages mentioned above.
Sodarace [a joint venture between: soda and Queen Mary, University of London]: "the online olympics pitting human creativity against machine learning in a competition to construct virtual racing robots. ... Sodarace is not just for fun. It is a shared competition for Artificial Intelligence researchers to test their learning algorithms while also being a play space in which to communicate the benefits of Artificial Intelligence research with a wide audience and promote a creative exploration of physics and engineering."
Also see:
AI in the news
Robot Competitions Over the Years: A Retrospective. AI Magazine 23:1 (Spring 2002).
Robot Competition Links from RobotBooks.com
Statistics
The International Federation of Robotics
Robotics Online, from The Robotic Industries Association, offers an assortment of very helpful resources including current news articles and Robotics Industry Statistics.
Our collection of Robotics Statistics
"BEST is a non-profit, volunteer-based organization whose mission is to inspire students to pursue careers in engineering, science, and technology through participation in a sports-like, science and engineering-based robotics competition."
"Botball is a hands-on learning experience in robotics designed to engage students in learning the practical applications of science, technology, engineering and math." As explained on the About Botball page: "Presented in your region by KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, the Botball Educational Robotics Program integrates science, technology, engineering and math with robotics to keep your students on the forefront of technology. Any middle or high school aged student can participate in Botball as long as the team has an adult contact. The organization of the team is up to the team leader."
Be sure to check out the [AITopics/Software#robotcode | robot products and programming tutorial]], and see what's happening at their National Conference on Educational Robotics.
And check out this Robotics and Engineering Course (available online from NASA's Robotics Alliance Project): Robotics with the XBC Controller. Instructor: David Culp (August 8 - September 7, 2006). "An introduction to key robotics and engineering concepts by utilizing a hands-on and project based approach to learning. Students will explore autonomous mobile robotic systems using advanced robotics hardware and software from the KISS Institute for Practical Robotics."
Eurobot: "An amazing event gathering fun, high technology, friendship, creativity, education and passion! Created in 1998, Eurobot is a international amateur robotics contest open to teams of young people, organised either in student projects or in independent clubs. Eurobot takes place in Europe but also welcomes countries from other continents."
"FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) is a multinational non-profit organization, that aspires to transform culture, making science, math, engineering, and technology as cool for kids as sports are today." "The FIRST LEGO League (FLL), considered the 'little league' of the FIRST Robotics Competition, is the result of a partnership between FIRST and the LEGO Group. FLL extends the FIRST concept of inspiring and celebrating science and technology to children aged 9 through 14, using real-world context and hands-on experimentation."
"The FIRST Robotics Competition is an exciting, multinational competition that teams professionals and young people to solve an engineering design problem in an intense and competitive way. The program is a life-changing, career-molding experienceóand a lot of fun. In 2005 the competition will reach close to 25,000 high-school-aged young people on close to 1,000 teams in 30 competitions. Our teams come from Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Israel, Mexico, the U.K., and almost every U.S. state."
Grand Challenges: several in our collection involve robots!
RoboCup: "an international joint project to promote AI, robotics, and related field. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined. RoboCup chose to use soccer game as a central topic of research, aiming at innovations to be applied for socially significant problems and industries. The ultimate goal of the RoboCup project is By 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world champion team in soccer."
Also see RoboCup-Rescue on our Hazards & Disasters page, and this article:
RoboCup Rescue: A Grand Challenge for Multiagent and Intelligent Systems. By Hiroaki Kitano and Satoshi Tadokoro. AI Magazine 22(1): Spring 2001, 39-52. "Disaster rescue is one of the most serious social issues that involves very large numbers of heterogeneous agents in the hostile environment. The intention of the RoboCup Rescue project is to promote research and development in this socially significant domain at various levels, involving multiagent teamwork coordination, physical agents for search and rescue, information infrastructures, personal digital assistants, a standard simulator and decision-support systems, evaluation benchmarks for rescue strategies, and robotic systems that are all integrated into a comprehensive system in the future. ... In this article, we present a detailed analysis of the task domain and elucidate characteristics necessary for multiagent and intelligent systems for this domain. Then, we present an overview of the RoboCup Rescue project."
Historical note: "The idea of robots playing soccer was first mentioned by Professor Alan Mackworth (University of British Columbia, Canada) in a paper entitled 'On Seeing Robots' presented at VI-92, 1992. and later published in a book Computer Vision: System, Theory, and Applications, pages 1-13, World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1993. A series of papers on the Dynamo robot soccer project was published by his group. Independently, a group of Japanese researchers organized a Workshop on Grand Challenges in Artificial Intelligence in October, 1992 in Tokyo, discussing possible grand challenge problems. This workshop led to a serious discussions of using the game of soccer for promoting science and technology." - from A Brief History of RoboCup.
And be sure to watch Dynamos and Dynamites - The World's First Soccer Playing Robots, a collection of videos on Professor Alan Mackworth's Robot Soccer page.
Articles:
RoboCup. AI Magazine 21 (1), Spring 2000. Among the many articles you'll find in this exciting issue are: Overview of RoboCup-98 (Minoru Asada, Manuela M. Veloso, Milind Tambe, Itsuki Noda, Hiroaki Kitano, and Gerhard K. Kraetzschmar), AAAI-98 Robot Exhibition (Karen Zita Haigh and Tucker Balch), and Using Robot Competitions to Promote Intellectual Development (Robin R. Murphy)
The AAAI 2006 Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition. By Paul E. Rybski, Jeffrey Forbes, Debra Burhans, Zach Dodds, Paul Oh, Matthias Scheutz, and Bob Avanzato. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 101.
RoboCup: 10 Years of Achievements and Future Challenges. By Ubbo Visser and Hans-Dieter Burkhard. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 115. "Will we see autonomous humanoid robots that play (and win) soccer against the human soccer world champion in the year 2050? This question is not easy to answer, and the idea is quite visionary. However, this is the goal of the RoboCup Federation. There are serious research questions that have to be tackled behind the scenes of a soccer game: perception, decision making, action selection, hardware design, materials, energy, and more. RoboCup is also about the nature of intelligence, and playing soccer acts as a performance measure of systems that contain artificial intelligence in much the same way chess has been used over the last century. This article outlines the current situation following 10 years of research with reference to the results of the 2006 World Championship in Bremen, Germany, and discusses future challenges."
See More Readings below and AI Magazine and for more articles about RoboCup and other competitions.
"RoboFesta – Europe is part of an international movement to promote interest throughout Europe in science and technology through many different kinds of robotics activities. These include many exciting robot competitions for children and adults, expositions, technical meetings, and widespread media cover. RoboFesta began in Japan in 1999, and is rapidly spreading throughout the world."
RoboFesta-UK
RoboFesta-France
Additional countries and lots of resources can be found by using the links on any of the RoboFesta pages mentioned above.
Sodarace [a joint venture between: soda and Queen Mary, University of London]: "the online olympics pitting human creativity against machine learning in a competition to construct virtual racing robots. ... Sodarace is not just for fun. It is a shared competition for Artificial Intelligence researchers to test their learning algorithms while also being a play space in which to communicate the benefits of Artificial Intelligence research with a wide audience and promote a creative exploration of physics and engineering."
Also see:
AI in the news
Robot Competitions Over the Years: A Retrospective. AI Magazine 23:1 (Spring 2002).
Robot Competition Links from RobotBooks.com
Statistics
The International Federation of Robotics
Robotics Online, from The Robotic Industries Association, offers an assortment of very helpful resources including current news articles and Robotics Industry Statistics.
Our collection of Robotics Statistics
"Botball is a hands-on learning experience in robotics designed to engage students in learning the practical applications of science, technology, engineering and math." As explained on the About Botball page: "Presented in your region by KISS Institute for Practical Robotics, the Botball Educational Robotics Program integrates science, technology, engineering and math with robotics to keep your students on the forefront of technology. Any middle or high school aged student can participate in Botball as long as the team has an adult contact. The organization of the team is up to the team leader."
Be sure to check out the [AITopics/Software#robotcode | robot products and programming tutorial]], and see what's happening at their National Conference on Educational Robotics.
And check out this Robotics and Engineering Course (available online from NASA's Robotics Alliance Project): Robotics with the XBC Controller. Instructor: David Culp (August 8 - September 7, 2006). "An introduction to key robotics and engineering concepts by utilizing a hands-on and project based approach to learning. Students will explore autonomous mobile robotic systems using advanced robotics hardware and software from the KISS Institute for Practical Robotics."
Eurobot: "An amazing event gathering fun, high technology, friendship, creativity, education and passion! Created in 1998, Eurobot is a international amateur robotics contest open to teams of young people, organised either in student projects or in independent clubs. Eurobot takes place in Europe but also welcomes countries from other continents."
"FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) is a multinational non-profit organization, that aspires to transform culture, making science, math, engineering, and technology as cool for kids as sports are today." "The FIRST LEGO League (FLL), considered the 'little league' of the FIRST Robotics Competition, is the result of a partnership between FIRST and the LEGO Group. FLL extends the FIRST concept of inspiring and celebrating science and technology to children aged 9 through 14, using real-world context and hands-on experimentation."
"The FIRST Robotics Competition is an exciting, multinational competition that teams professionals and young people to solve an engineering design problem in an intense and competitive way. The program is a life-changing, career-molding experienceóand a lot of fun. In 2005 the competition will reach close to 25,000 high-school-aged young people on close to 1,000 teams in 30 competitions. Our teams come from Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Israel, Mexico, the U.K., and almost every U.S. state."
Grand Challenges: several in our collection involve robots!
RoboCup: "an international joint project to promote AI, robotics, and related field. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined. RoboCup chose to use soccer game as a central topic of research, aiming at innovations to be applied for socially significant problems and industries. The ultimate goal of the RoboCup project is By 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world champion team in soccer."
Also see RoboCup-Rescue on our Hazards & Disasters page, and this article:
RoboCup Rescue: A Grand Challenge for Multiagent and Intelligent Systems. By Hiroaki Kitano and Satoshi Tadokoro. AI Magazine 22(1): Spring 2001, 39-52. "Disaster rescue is one of the most serious social issues that involves very large numbers of heterogeneous agents in the hostile environment. The intention of the RoboCup Rescue project is to promote research and development in this socially significant domain at various levels, involving multiagent teamwork coordination, physical agents for search and rescue, information infrastructures, personal digital assistants, a standard simulator and decision-support systems, evaluation benchmarks for rescue strategies, and robotic systems that are all integrated into a comprehensive system in the future. ... In this article, we present a detailed analysis of the task domain and elucidate characteristics necessary for multiagent and intelligent systems for this domain. Then, we present an overview of the RoboCup Rescue project."
Historical note: "The idea of robots playing soccer was first mentioned by Professor Alan Mackworth (University of British Columbia, Canada) in a paper entitled 'On Seeing Robots' presented at VI-92, 1992. and later published in a book Computer Vision: System, Theory, and Applications, pages 1-13, World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1993. A series of papers on the Dynamo robot soccer project was published by his group. Independently, a group of Japanese researchers organized a Workshop on Grand Challenges in Artificial Intelligence in October, 1992 in Tokyo, discussing possible grand challenge problems. This workshop led to a serious discussions of using the game of soccer for promoting science and technology." - from A Brief History of RoboCup.
And be sure to watch Dynamos and Dynamites - The World's First Soccer Playing Robots, a collection of videos on Professor Alan Mackworth's Robot Soccer page.
Articles:
RoboCup. AI Magazine 21 (1), Spring 2000. Among the many articles you'll find in this exciting issue are: Overview of RoboCup-98 (Minoru Asada, Manuela M. Veloso, Milind Tambe, Itsuki Noda, Hiroaki Kitano, and Gerhard K. Kraetzschmar), AAAI-98 Robot Exhibition (Karen Zita Haigh and Tucker Balch), and Using Robot Competitions to Promote Intellectual Development (Robin R. Murphy)
The AAAI 2006 Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition. By Paul E. Rybski, Jeffrey Forbes, Debra Burhans, Zach Dodds, Paul Oh, Matthias Scheutz, and Bob Avanzato. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 101.
RoboCup: 10 Years of Achievements and Future Challenges. By Ubbo Visser and Hans-Dieter Burkhard. AI Magazine 28(2): Summer 2007, 115. "Will we see autonomous humanoid robots that play (and win) soccer against the human soccer world champion in the year 2050? This question is not easy to answer, and the idea is quite visionary. However, this is the goal of the RoboCup Federation. There are serious research questions that have to be tackled behind the scenes of a soccer game: perception, decision making, action selection, hardware design, materials, energy, and more. RoboCup is also about the nature of intelligence, and playing soccer acts as a performance measure of systems that contain artificial intelligence in much the same way chess has been used over the last century. This article outlines the current situation following 10 years of research with reference to the results of the 2006 World Championship in Bremen, Germany, and discusses future challenges."
See More Readings below and AI Magazine and for more articles about RoboCup and other competitions.
"RoboFesta – Europe is part of an international movement to promote interest throughout Europe in science and technology through many different kinds of robotics activities. These include many exciting robot competitions for children and adults, expositions, technical meetings, and widespread media cover. RoboFesta began in Japan in 1999, and is rapidly spreading throughout the world."
RoboFesta-UK
RoboFesta-France
Additional countries and lots of resources can be found by using the links on any of the RoboFesta pages mentioned above.
Sodarace [a joint venture between: soda and Queen Mary, University of London]: "the online olympics pitting human creativity against machine learning in a competition to construct virtual racing robots. ... Sodarace is not just for fun. It is a shared competition for Artificial Intelligence researchers to test their learning algorithms while also being a play space in which to communicate the benefits of Artificial Intelligence research with a wide audience and promote a creative exploration of physics and engineering."
Also see:
AI in the news
Robot Competitions Over the Years: A Retrospective. AI Magazine 23:1 (Spring 2002).
Robot Competition Links from RobotBooks.com
Statistics
The International Federation of Robotics
Robotics Online, from The Robotic Industries Association, offers an assortment of very helpful resources including current news articles and Robotics Industry Statistics.
Our collection of Robotics Statistics
YouTube
botic Life Group at the MIT Media Lab. " We create socially intelligent robotic creatures that communicate with us, cooperate with us, and learn from us as capable partners."
Shakey the Robot, from SRI's innovation timeline:"From 1966 through 1972, the Artificial Intelligence Center at SRI International (then Stanford Research Institute) conducted research on a mobile robot system nicknamed ìShakey.î Endowed with a limited ability to perceive and model its environment, Shakey could perform tasks that required planning, route-finding, and the rearranging of simple objects. Although the Shakey project led to numerous advances in AI techniques, many of which were reported in the literature, much specific information appears only in a series of previously relatively inaccessible SRI technical reports." Those reports and other resources are now available and can be accessed from this SRI page.
Also see this related article: Robot learns to grasp everyday chores. By Brian D. Lee. Stanford Report (November 8, 2006). "Stanford scientists plan to make a robot capable of performing everyday tasks, such as unloading the dishwasher. By programming the robot with 'intelligent' software that enables it to pick up objects it has never seen before, the scientists are one step closer to creating a real life Rosie, the robot maid from The Jetsons cartoon show. 'Within a decade we hope to develop the technology that will make it useful to put a robot in every home and office,' said Andrew Ng, an assistant professor of computer science who is leading the wireless Stanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (STAIR) project. ... Stanford has a history of leading the field of artificial intelligence. In 1966, scientists at the Stanford Research Institute built Shakey, the first robot to combine problem solving, movement and perception. Flakey, a robot that could wander independently, followed. In 2005, Stanford engineers won the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Grand Challenge with Stanley, a robot Volkswagen that autonomously drove 132 miles through a desert course. The ultimate aim for artificial intelligence is to build a robot that can create and execute plans to achieve a goal. 'The last serious attempt to do something like this was in 1966 with the Shakey project led by Nils Nilsson,' Ng said. 'This is a project in Shakey's tradition, done with 2006 technology instead of 1966 AI technology.' To succeed, the scientists will need to unite fragmented research areas of artificial intelligence including speech processing, navigation, manipulation, planning, reasoning, machine learning and vision."
And see:
Shakey's page at The Robot Hall of Fame,
the 1972 video, Shakey the Robot, just one of the Shakey videos that can be found in our AI Videos collection.
Stanley "Volkswagen wins robotic race across the desert", By David L Chandler. NewScientist news (October 10, 2005). "A robotic Volkswagen called 'Stanley', developed by a team from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, won a $2 million prize on Sunday for winning a tough desert race of driverless vehicles.... 'These vehicles haven't just achieved world records, they have made history,' says DARPA director Tony Tether."
Vikia and the Social Robot Project. "The goal of the Social Robot Project is to overcome the human-robot social barrier. Towards this end, we are in the process of developing a robot which bears a personality, and which can behave according to social conventions. The idea is that communication and interaction with robots should be easy and enjoyable, both for unfamiliar users and trained professionals. We want robots to behave more like people, so that people do not have to behave like robots when they interact with them."
"At CMU [Carnegie Mellon University], Grace serves as VIKIA's sucessor as a platform for the social robots project."
The Robotics Institute at the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Check out their collection of projects and find out who Pearl is . . . and what a HeartLanderdoes.
Seven Amazing Robots That Will Change Your Life, from Forbes.com.
List of Famous Robots with videos from YouTube.
Shakey the Robot, from SRI's innovation timeline:"From 1966 through 1972, the Artificial Intelligence Center at SRI International (then Stanford Research Institute) conducted research on a mobile robot system nicknamed ìShakey.î Endowed with a limited ability to perceive and model its environment, Shakey could perform tasks that required planning, route-finding, and the rearranging of simple objects. Although the Shakey project led to numerous advances in AI techniques, many of which were reported in the literature, much specific information appears only in a series of previously relatively inaccessible SRI technical reports." Those reports and other resources are now available and can be accessed from this SRI page.
Also see this related article: Robot learns to grasp everyday chores. By Brian D. Lee. Stanford Report (November 8, 2006). "Stanford scientists plan to make a robot capable of performing everyday tasks, such as unloading the dishwasher. By programming the robot with 'intelligent' software that enables it to pick up objects it has never seen before, the scientists are one step closer to creating a real life Rosie, the robot maid from The Jetsons cartoon show. 'Within a decade we hope to develop the technology that will make it useful to put a robot in every home and office,' said Andrew Ng, an assistant professor of computer science who is leading the wireless Stanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (STAIR) project. ... Stanford has a history of leading the field of artificial intelligence. In 1966, scientists at the Stanford Research Institute built Shakey, the first robot to combine problem solving, movement and perception. Flakey, a robot that could wander independently, followed. In 2005, Stanford engineers won the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Grand Challenge with Stanley, a robot Volkswagen that autonomously drove 132 miles through a desert course. The ultimate aim for artificial intelligence is to build a robot that can create and execute plans to achieve a goal. 'The last serious attempt to do something like this was in 1966 with the Shakey project led by Nils Nilsson,' Ng said. 'This is a project in Shakey's tradition, done with 2006 technology instead of 1966 AI technology.' To succeed, the scientists will need to unite fragmented research areas of artificial intelligence including speech processing, navigation, manipulation, planning, reasoning, machine learning and vision."
And see:
Shakey's page at The Robot Hall of Fame,
the 1972 video, Shakey the Robot, just one of the Shakey videos that can be found in our AI Videos collection.
Stanley "Volkswagen wins robotic race across the desert", By David L Chandler. NewScientist news (October 10, 2005). "A robotic Volkswagen called 'Stanley', developed by a team from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, won a $2 million prize on Sunday for winning a tough desert race of driverless vehicles.... 'These vehicles haven't just achieved world records, they have made history,' says DARPA director Tony Tether."
Vikia and the Social Robot Project. "The goal of the Social Robot Project is to overcome the human-robot social barrier. Towards this end, we are in the process of developing a robot which bears a personality, and which can behave according to social conventions. The idea is that communication and interaction with robots should be easy and enjoyable, both for unfamiliar users and trained professionals. We want robots to behave more like people, so that people do not have to behave like robots when they interact with them."
"At CMU [Carnegie Mellon University], Grace serves as VIKIA's sucessor as a platform for the social robots project."
The Robotics Institute at the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Check out their collection of projects and find out who Pearl is . . . and what a HeartLanderdoes.
Seven Amazing Robots That Will Change Your Life, from Forbes.com.
List of Famous Robots with videos from YouTube.
Meet Some Robots
Robots! A website from The University of Birmingham. "Explore our site to find all about the real robots that we build - sporty robots, clever robots, smiley robots, and ... ooo, those pesky robots! Ask your questions about robots to our expert - Professor Robotnik! Read about robo-pets and robo-footballers! Build your own robots!"
Among the questions that have been asked of the Prof are "How can I build a robot that has a human personality?" and "What is a robot?"
Be sure to see their richly illustrated History of Robotics.
Robots, a CBBC Newsround Guide: *What is a robot? *Robots in films *Award winning robots *Robot gadgets and toys *What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? *The world's most powerful computer *Robots then and now *Robots in the future *Robots in space.
Another helpful resource from the the BBC is the Robotics section of the Ask a Teacher feature of BBC Education Scotland's Standard Grade Bitesize site.
Examining the Sensitive Side of Robots. [Radio broadcast.] NPR's Talk of the Nation (March 21, 2007). "Science fiction and pop culture have conspired to make most of us think of robots as something out of Terminator or I, Robot. But after six years of behind-the-scenes reporting from the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Lee Gutkind knows better. Gutkind, the founder and editor of the literary journal Creative Nonfiction, examines the subculture surrounding these mechanical creatures in a new book, Almost Human: Making Robots Think. He found that today's robots are more fun than ferocious, and scientists are making wires and chips increasingly human-like. Gutkind talks with Neal Conan about the sensitive side of robots."
Also see: Outsized effort powers robots in 'Almost Human.' Book review by David Templeton. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (March 14, 2007). "[I]t's the dramatic tale of Carnegie Mellon University roboticists working to build robots that feature human-like abilities when they move, see, record, learn, and even understand. Lee Gutkind, the self-described 'godfather of creative nonfiction,' tells their story in his latest book that provides an inside look into Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute. 'Almost Human: Making Robots Think,' the 320-page book published by WW Norton.... 'It's a great test of character to get them to work,' Mr. Gutkind said of robots that do not make good eye contact with humans. 'The main thesis is that young people are making things happen.'"
The Humanoid Race - Machines are getting more and more like the rest of us. A piece-by-piece guide to the globe's most advanced bots. By Robert Capps. Wired Magazine (July 2004; Issue 12.07). "With each advance in computing speed, battery capacity, camera and motor miniaturization, and software capability, the world grows closer to the ultimate goal of robotics: a walking, talking, feeling android worthy of our cinematic inspirations. Consider the progress of just the past 15 years. There are now robots that can get around on two legs, participate in simple conversations, and manipulate objects in rudimentary ways. ... And while there are a number of extremely complex problems to solve before we can make something as advanced as Sonny, the star of I, Robot, we're getting there, one piece at a time. To find out where the state of the art lies, Wired surveyed the projects that might one day add up to an android just like the rest of us. "
Ethics for the Robot Age - Should bots carry weapons? Should they win patents? Questions we must answer as automation advances. View by Jordan Pollack. Wired Magazine (January 2005; Issue 13.01). "My definition of a robot is any device controlled by software that can work 24/7 and put people out of work. The machines are not intelligent. ... In case you missed them, today's most popular robots are ATMs and computer printers. While our hopes for and fears of robots may be overblown, there is plenty to worry about as automation progresses. The future will have many more robots, and they'll most certainly be much more advanced. This raises important ethical questions that we must begin to confront. 1. Should robots be humanoid? ... 2. Should humans become robots? ... 4. Should robots eat? ... 6. Should robots carry weapons? ..."
Also see our Ethical and Social Implications and Science Fiction pages.
Robocup "is an international research and education initiative. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined, as well as being used for integrated project-oriented education." Links to soccer and rescue competitions and to a library of videos.
Robots and Robotics in Undergraduate AI Education. AI Magazine 27(1), Spring 2006.
Overview of Research Challenges -- summary of four workshops sponsored by The Computing Community Consortium. February, 2009.
The Robots Among Us - If robotics technology now stands where computing did in the '70s, what can we expect in the future? By Tom Abate. San Francisco Chronicle (December 7, 2007). "It may seem like a science fiction leap to go from the dust-sucking Roomba to the walking, talking machines of movie and television fame. But David Calkins, 39, director of the San Francisco State University Robotics Institute, says it isn't so much that the robots are coming as that they are already working for us under different names. 'Why do we call a Roomba a robot and not a dishwasher?' asks Calkins, arguing that we already rely on increasingly clever special-purpose devices and programs such as search engines, which use rudimentary artificial intelligence to answer queries and rank replies. ... 'It's a problem of definitions,' says Calkins. 'People use the r-word to mean so many different things.'"
The 50 Best Robots Ever. By Robert Capps. Wired (January 2006; Issue 14.01). "They're exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They're saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They're transforming factory floors and filmmaking. They're - oh c'mon, they're just plain cool! From Qrio to the Terminator, here are our absolute favorites (at least for now)."
Meet Penelope at the Robotic Surgical Tech, Inc. web site.
The gentle rise of the machines. Robotics - The science-fiction dream that robots would one day become a part of everyday life was absurd. Or was it? The Economist Technology Quarterly (March 11, 2004). "Since 1939, when Westinghouse Electric introduced Electro, a mechanical man, at the World's Fair in New York, robot fans have imagined a world filled with tireless robotic helpers, always on hand to wash dishes, do the laundry and handle the drudgery of everyday tasks. So far, however, such robots have proliferated in science fiction, but have proved rather more elusive in the real world. But optimists are now arguing that the success of the Roomba and of toys such as Aibo, Sony's robot dog, combined with the plunging cost of computer power, could mean that the long-awaited mass market for robots is finally within reach."
Trust me, I'm a robot - Robot safety: As robots move into homes and offices, ensuring that they do not injure people will be vital. But how? The Economist Technology Quarterly (June 8, 2006). "Last year there were 77 robot-related accidents in Britain alone, according to the Health and Safety Executive. With robots now poised to emerge from their industrial cages and to move into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences -- an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons -- the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily. ... According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly outstripping their industrial counterparts. ... So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? 'Not enough,' says Blay Whitby, an artificial-intelligence expert at the University of Sussex in England. ... Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. 'When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?' asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally 'yes'. But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says."
Robots/ Mechanical Life. NPR Talk of the Nation: Science Friday With Ira Flatow (August 30, 2002). "This week, an automated convenience store opened in Washington. This robo-mart dispenses snacks, toiletries, and even DVDs. From housekeeping to the battlefield to your neighborhood convenience store, researchers are creating robots to live with us and work for us. In this hour, we'll look at how robots may change our lives. Plus, early attempts to create mechanical life." Guests: Rodney Brooks & Gaby Wood. You can listen to the radio broadcast by clicking here.
The robot that thinks like you... Scientists built a robot that thinks like we do and set it loose to explore the world. New Scientist discovers what happened next By Douglas Fox. New Scientist (November 5, 2005; subscription req'd.; Issue 2524). "The infant I am watching wander around its rather spartan playpen in the Neurosciences Institute (NSI) in La Jolla, California, is a more limited creature. It is a trashcan-shaped robot called Darwin VII, and it has just 20,000 brain cells. Despite this, it has managed to master the abilities of a 18-month-old baby -- a pretty impressive feat for a machine. ... Darwin VII is the fourth in a series of robots that Jeff Krichmar and his colleagues at NSI have created in a quest to better understand how our own brains work. ... The idea of an artificial neural network that could perform computations was proposed as long ago as 1943, by Warren McCullough and Walter Pitts at the University of Illinois. ... [I]n the past few years, neuroscientists and AI researchers have started collaborating more closely, and their labours are beginning to bear fruit. Their conclusions challenge two decades of research into artificial neural networks."
Visit the %newwinNeurosciences Institute ... and meet Jeffrey L. Krichmar and Nomad & Darwin!
The Real Transformers - Researchers are programming robots to learn in humanlike ways and show humanlike traits. Could this be the beginning of robot consciousness -- and of a better understanding of ourselves? By Robin Marantz Henig. The New York Times Sunday Magazine (July 29, 2007 cover story). "I was introduced to my first sociable robot on a sunny afternoon in June. The robot, developed by graduate students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was named Mertz. ... "
What We Can Learn from Robots. By Gregory T. Huang. Technology Review (January 2005). "On a crisp October day last year, Carnegie Mellon Universityís Robotics Institute kicked off its 25th-anniversary celebration.... On the third day, it was Mitsuo Kawatoís turn to speak. The lights went down, and the director of the ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, made his way to the stage to the beat of rock music. ... [T] here is a difference between him and other attendees. Kawato loves robots not because they are cool, but because he believes they can teach him how the human brain works. 'Only when we try to reproduce brain functions in artificial machines can we understand the information processing of the brain,' he says. Itís what he calls 'understanding the brain by creating the brain.' By programming a robot to reach out and grasp an object, for instance, Kawato hopes to learn the patterns in which electrical signals flow among neurons in the brain to control a human arm. ... 'This is very different from the usual justification for building humanoid robots --- that they are economically useful or will help take care of the elderly,' says Christopher Atkeson, a robotics expert at Carnegie Mellon."
Bots on The Ground - In the Field of Battle (Or Even Above It), Robots Are a Soldier's Best Friend. By Joel Garreau The Washington Post (May 6, 2007). "The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have become an unprecedented field study in human relationships with intelligent machines. These conflicts are the first in history to see widespread deployment of thousands of battle bots. ... Even more startling than these machines' capabilities, however, are the effects they have on their friendly keepers who, for example, award their bots 'battlefield promotions' and 'purple hearts.' ... Humans have long displayed an uncanny ability to make emotional connections with their manufactured helpmates. ... Digital pets like the Tamagotchi or the Furby, designed to be cute, have long caused children to make spooky levels of connection. Sherry Turkle, founder of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, quotes kids describing intelligent machines as 'sort of alive.' ... Humans respond so readily to Kismet, created by Cynthia Breazeal, that graduate students working in the lab at night have been known to put up a curtain between themselves and the bot, [Rodney] Brooks reports. ... The 2 million personal bots in use around the world in 2004 are expected to grow to 7 million next year. The South Korean Ministry of Information and Communication hopes to put a bot in every home there within six years."
Robots get friendly - Robots are acting more like people. Will our attachments eventually become too strong? By Gregory M. Lamb. The Christian Science Monitor (February 5, 2003). "Of course, computers and their physical manifestations, robots, are already deeply embedded in our lives. In some sense, ATM machines, self-service gas pumps, and TiVo video recorders serve as rudimentary robots. Now, scientists are pushing to make these machines more sophisticated and humanlike, both in appearance [see related story] and intelligence. ... Some experts worry that attachments may become too strong [see the other related story: If you kick a robotic dog, is it wrong?], subjecting people to manipulation by clever programmers or unnatural reliance on machines for companionship."
Newsmaker interview with Rodney Brooks, director of MIT's CSAIL and CTO of iRobot: Sizing up the coming robotics revolution. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 15, 2007). "When it comes to robots, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab is one of the places in the world where the magic happens. Rodney Brooks is the Panasonic professor of robotics at MIT and the director of CSAIL. He is also the co-founder and chief technology officer of iRobot and one of the principal architects of iRobot's Roomba vacuum. On Tuesday, RoboBusiness 2007, an international conference showcasing consumer, commercial and military robots, will convene in Boston. To gain insight on what's in the pipeline, CNET News.com sat down with Brooks, one of the leading experts on robots and artificial intelligence. From his office at CSAIL, Brooks shared his thoughts on the best AI readily available today and the four things it will take for the magicians of science to match science fiction fantasies."
Newsmaker interview with Matt Mason, director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University - Roboticist inspired by more than machines. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 18, 2007). "On Tuesday, Matt Mason, the director of the Robotics Institute at CMU announced the 2007 inductees into the Robot Hall of Fame. The honor, which is judged by a jury of both leading science and science fiction experts, was created in April 2003 to call attention to the contributions robots and their creators make to society. Mason is known for his work on the mechanics of robot manipulation and has written four books on the topic. He spent some time with CNET News.com from the great glass hall of the Hynes Convention Center in Boston during RoboBusiness 2007."
Domestic bliss through mechanical marvels? By Kevin Maney. USA Today (September 1, 2004). "Never mind the humanoid Automated Domestic Assistants walking rich people's pets in the movie I, Robot, or the accordion-armed Robot B9 in TV classic Lost in Space warning of danger on lonely planets. The real force driving the development of personal robots -- and what will eventually create demand for them in the marketplace -- is aging baby boomers. That's the secret among robotics researchers and budding robot companies. As the horde of boomers become old, they increasingly will be unable to care for themselves or their homes. They'll face a social and medical system straining to help them. But they'll be comfortable with technology. ... Robots that are likely to serve the elderly seem to fall into three broad categories. Though the categories don't officially have names, you could call them homebots, carebots and joybots. A look at those categories speaks volumes about what's going on in robotics -- and what's still beyond technology's reach. ... 'Whether or not you have to love your robot is another question,' Brooks says. 'I don't need my ATM to be cute.' Here is a great point of departure between U.S. and Japanese robotics research. U.S. labs and companies generally approach robots as tools. The Japanese approach them as beings. That explains a lot about robot projects coming out of Japan."
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Robots - Modern robots can respond to emotion and the smell of fine wines. By Sean Markey and Corey S. Powell. Discover Magazine (April 2, 2007).
Getting a Grip - Building the Ultimate Robotic Hand. By Gregory Mone. Wired (Issue 15.12; December 2007). "A 6-foot-tall, one-armed robot named Stair 1.0 balances on a modified Segway platform in the doorway of a Stanford University conference room. ... From his seat at a polished table, roboticist Morgan Quigley sends the bot on a mission. 'Stair, please fetch the stapler from the lab.' ... To do real work in our offices and homes, to fetch our staplers or clean up our rooms, robots are going to have to master their hands. They'll need the kind of 'hand-eye' coordination that enables them to identify targets, guide their mechanical mitts toward them, and then manipulate the objects deftly. There's a growing need for robots with these skills. In Japan, the elder care industry is already employing robots as assistants. To keep seniors out of costly nursing homes, though, they need to be able to perform household chores like serving up a drink. Even that simple task will entail plucking a glass out of a crowded cupboard, finding and removing a bottle from a fridge, and then pouring the beverage from one container into the other. And the bot needs to do all this without spilling, dropping, or breaking anything. ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett [Technology]. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before.† ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before. ... As Europe's preeminent robotics facility and one of the world's epicenters of artificial intelligence research, [University of Genoa's Laboratory for Integrated Advanced Robotics is] dominated by eggheads staring at monitors. And, of course, there's an android hanging around the place. The size and shape of a 3-year-old, RobotCub has two five-fingered hands,"
Meet the robots:
STAIR: STanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (Stanford University)
Uman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst campus)
RobotCub consortium
Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendant Mind. By Hans Moravec (1998). New York: Oxford University Press. An adventurous look at the future in which the author sees intelligent machines surpassing their human creators as the next evolutionary step. The author's web page includes an in-depth look at the book. You may also want to read the transcript of a November 1998 interview with Hans Moravec.
The Scientific Relevance of Robotics (Remarks at the Dedication of the CMU Robotics Institute). By Allen Newell. AI Magazine 2(1): 24-26, 34 (Winter 1980). "My first point, then, is to remind you that science doesn't fit any single mold. ... From where I stand, it is easy to see the science lurking in robotics. It lies in the welding of intelligence to energy. That is, it lies in intelligent perception and intelligent control of motion."
Emotionware. By Lynellen D.S. Perry (1996). ACM Crossroads Student Magazine. "The capability of displaying emotion seems to be a critical component of creating intelligent agents with whom humans can comfortably relate and communicate. The emotional aspect distinguishes a dead machine from an agent who is believable, alive, and trustworthy."
The Intimate Machine. Scientific American Frontiers (October 22, 2002). "Scientists blend technology with sociology to make our machines more fun to use."
The programmable robot of ancient Greece. By Noel Sharkey (Professor of artificial intelligence and robotics at the University of Sheffield, UK. His forthcoming book is called The Tin Man). New Scientist (July 7, 2007; Issue 2611: pages 32-35; subscription req'd). "Constructing a mechanical lion that could walk, let alone present flowers to the king, can't have been a simple task back in 1515 - even for a genius like Leonardo da Vinci. How he managed this feat remained a mystery until 2000, when US robotics expert Mark Rosheim came to a surprising conclusion. ... [W]as da Vinci influenced by an earlier design? And if so, how far back in history can we trace programmable robots? In search of answers I followed the technology back through medieval Europe to the Islamic world, where I have found evidence of an even earlier programmable automaton, made in Baghdad by the brilliant 13th-century engineer Ibn Ismail Ibn al-Razzaz Al-Jazari. ... Yet the trail doesn't stop there. It led me even further back past the automata of the Byzantine court and ancient Rome to ancient Alexandria. It was here that Hero, one of the greatest Greek engineers, constructed a programmable robot that pre-dates da Vinci's by 1500 years. ... So what exactly do we mean by 'programmable'? ..."
Robots and the Rest of Us. View by Bruce Sterling. Wired Magazine (May 2004; Issue 12.05). "Since when do machines need an ethical code? For 80 years, visionaries have imagined robots that look like us, work like us, perceive the world, judge it, and take action on their own. The robot butler is still as mystical as the flying car, but there's trouble rising in the garage. In Nobel's vaulted ballroom, experts uneasily point out that automatons are challenging humankind on four fronts. First, this is a time of war. ... The prospect of autonomous weapons naturally raises ethical questions. ... The second ominous frontier is brain augmentation, best embodied by the remote-controlled rat recently created at SUNY Downstate in Brooklyn. ... Another troubling frontier is physical, as opposed to mental, augmentation. ... Frontier number four is social: human reaction to the troubling presence of the humanoid. ... If the [First International Symposium on Roboethics] offers a take-home message, it's not about robots, but about us."
Be sure to also visit our Ethical & Social Implications page.
Machine learning on physical robots [slide show with audio]. By Peter Stone, The University of Texas at Austin. Presented at the University of Pennsylvania's GRASP Lab's GRASP Seminar Series (March 31, 2006). Abstract: "As robot technology advances, we are approaching the day when robots will be deployed prevalently in uncontrolled, unpredictable environments: the proverbial 'real world.' As this happens, it will be essential for these robots to be able to adapt autonomously to their changing environment. For a robot to learn to improve its performance based entirely on real-world environmental feedback, the robot's behavior specification and learning algorithm must be constructed so as to enable data-efficient learning. This talk presents 3 examples of machine learning on physical robots. ..."
Man and machine - Part 1: the quest for mechanical man. By Dheera Sujan. Radio Netherlands (November 26, 2004). "In her book Edison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life, Gaby Wood documents the long history of humanity's fascination with mechanical representations of itself. And she poses the question - what do we want from a machine that simulates us? 'Is it supposed to be as close as possible to a human being, or to improve on that, and become superhuman? In the quest for mechanical perfection, does perfection mean infallibility (as in the computer), or innocence (as in the child)?' These questions have been around since the Enlightenment and the dawn of the age of machines; now researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence are returning to them as they gain renewed relevance. ... At what pointpoint does a humanoid machine achieve personhood? Dr [Anne] Foerst's search for an answer to this question has led her through a philosophical maze that has forced her to examine her own ideas on what it means to be alive. ... Fear has always been part of the fascination we have for the idea of reproducing ourselves mechanically. According to Dr Foerst, however, that won't happen if we take responsibility for our creation. After all, Dr Frankenstein didn't create a monster; the creature (never dignified with a name) only became a monster when he was rejected by his creator and the rest of mankind." ‘’You can listen to the broadcast via a link on the page.’’
Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals. By Juyang Weng, James McClelland, Alex Pentland, Olaf Sporns, Ida Stockman, Mriganka Sur, Esther Thelen. (2000). , Science, Vol. 291, No. 5504; pages 599 - 600, 26 January 2001). "How does one create an intelligent machine? This problem has proven difficult. Over the past several decades, scientists have taken one of three approaches: In the first, which is knowledge-based, an intelligent machine in a laboratory is directly programmed to perform a given task. In a second, learning-based approach, a computer is 'spoon-fed' human-edited sensory data while the machine is controlled by a task-specific learning program. Finally, by a 'genetic search,' robots have evolved through generations by the principle of survival of the fittest, mostly in a computer-simulated virtual world. Although notable, none of these is powerful enough to lead to machines having the complex, diverse, and highly integrated capabilities of an adult brain, such as vision, speech, and language. Nevertheless, these traditional approaches have served as the incubator for the birth and growth of a new direction for machine intelligence: autonomous mental development."
Also see: Developmental Robotics - A 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium.
WTEC [World Technology Evaluation Center] Study on International Research and Development in Robotics. "The purpose of this study is to gather information on worldwide status and trends in robotics R&D and disseminate it to government decision-makers and the research community. The study panelists will gather information on robotics R&D abroad useful to the U.S. government in its own R&D programs, and to critically analyze and compare the research in the United States with that being pursued in Japan, Korea, and Europe."
Proceedings of the U.S. review workshop held at the National Science Foundation on July 21-22, 2004: Review of U.S. Research in Robotics. The 6 research areas addressed are:
Network Robotics; Multi-Robot Systems; Sensor Networks, Environmental
Medical Robotics; Biological Applications; Bio/Pharmaceutical ; Assisitive/Rehabilitative
Cognitive Human-Robot Interaction (CHRI); Physical HRI (PHRI); Humanoids; Entertainment; Personal/Service; Educational
Space; Field; Military Applications; Underwater; UAV
Actuators/Mechanisms; Bio/Nano/Mems; Industrial Applications
Perception (Sensing, Vision, Imaging); Control, Architecture, and Learning; Navigation/Mapping
Also see this exhibit from the National Science Foundation which complements the final report of September 16, 2005.
Meet Some Robots
Among the questions that have been asked of the Prof are "How can I build a robot that has a human personality?" and "What is a robot?"
Be sure to see their richly illustrated History of Robotics.
Robots, a CBBC Newsround Guide: *What is a robot? *Robots in films *Award winning robots *Robot gadgets and toys *What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? *The world's most powerful computer *Robots then and now *Robots in the future *Robots in space.
Another helpful resource from the the BBC is the Robotics section of the Ask a Teacher feature of BBC Education Scotland's Standard Grade Bitesize site.
Examining the Sensitive Side of Robots. [Radio broadcast.] NPR's Talk of the Nation (March 21, 2007). "Science fiction and pop culture have conspired to make most of us think of robots as something out of Terminator or I, Robot. But after six years of behind-the-scenes reporting from the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Lee Gutkind knows better. Gutkind, the founder and editor of the literary journal Creative Nonfiction, examines the subculture surrounding these mechanical creatures in a new book, Almost Human: Making Robots Think. He found that today's robots are more fun than ferocious, and scientists are making wires and chips increasingly human-like. Gutkind talks with Neal Conan about the sensitive side of robots."
Also see: Outsized effort powers robots in 'Almost Human.' Book review by David Templeton. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (March 14, 2007). "[I]t's the dramatic tale of Carnegie Mellon University roboticists working to build robots that feature human-like abilities when they move, see, record, learn, and even understand. Lee Gutkind, the self-described 'godfather of creative nonfiction,' tells their story in his latest book that provides an inside look into Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute. 'Almost Human: Making Robots Think,' the 320-page book published by WW Norton.... 'It's a great test of character to get them to work,' Mr. Gutkind said of robots that do not make good eye contact with humans. 'The main thesis is that young people are making things happen.'"
The Humanoid Race - Machines are getting more and more like the rest of us. A piece-by-piece guide to the globe's most advanced bots. By Robert Capps. Wired Magazine (July 2004; Issue 12.07). "With each advance in computing speed, battery capacity, camera and motor miniaturization, and software capability, the world grows closer to the ultimate goal of robotics: a walking, talking, feeling android worthy of our cinematic inspirations. Consider the progress of just the past 15 years. There are now robots that can get around on two legs, participate in simple conversations, and manipulate objects in rudimentary ways. ... And while there are a number of extremely complex problems to solve before we can make something as advanced as Sonny, the star of I, Robot, we're getting there, one piece at a time. To find out where the state of the art lies, Wired surveyed the projects that might one day add up to an android just like the rest of us. "
Ethics for the Robot Age - Should bots carry weapons? Should they win patents? Questions we must answer as automation advances. View by Jordan Pollack. Wired Magazine (January 2005; Issue 13.01). "My definition of a robot is any device controlled by software that can work 24/7 and put people out of work. The machines are not intelligent. ... In case you missed them, today's most popular robots are ATMs and computer printers. While our hopes for and fears of robots may be overblown, there is plenty to worry about as automation progresses. The future will have many more robots, and they'll most certainly be much more advanced. This raises important ethical questions that we must begin to confront. 1. Should robots be humanoid? ... 2. Should humans become robots? ... 4. Should robots eat? ... 6. Should robots carry weapons? ..."
Also see our Ethical and Social Implications and Science Fiction pages.
Robocup "is an international research and education initiative. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined, as well as being used for integrated project-oriented education." Links to soccer and rescue competitions and to a library of videos.
Robots and Robotics in Undergraduate AI Education. AI Magazine 27(1), Spring 2006.
Overview of Research Challenges -- summary of four workshops sponsored by The Computing Community Consortium. February, 2009.
The Robots Among Us - If robotics technology now stands where computing did in the '70s, what can we expect in the future? By Tom Abate. San Francisco Chronicle (December 7, 2007). "It may seem like a science fiction leap to go from the dust-sucking Roomba to the walking, talking machines of movie and television fame. But David Calkins, 39, director of the San Francisco State University Robotics Institute, says it isn't so much that the robots are coming as that they are already working for us under different names. 'Why do we call a Roomba a robot and not a dishwasher?' asks Calkins, arguing that we already rely on increasingly clever special-purpose devices and programs such as search engines, which use rudimentary artificial intelligence to answer queries and rank replies. ... 'It's a problem of definitions,' says Calkins. 'People use the r-word to mean so many different things.'"
The 50 Best Robots Ever. By Robert Capps. Wired (January 2006; Issue 14.01). "They're exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They're saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They're transforming factory floors and filmmaking. They're - oh c'mon, they're just plain cool! From Qrio to the Terminator, here are our absolute favorites (at least for now)."
Meet Penelope at the Robotic Surgical Tech, Inc. web site.
The gentle rise of the machines. Robotics - The science-fiction dream that robots would one day become a part of everyday life was absurd. Or was it? The Economist Technology Quarterly (March 11, 2004). "Since 1939, when Westinghouse Electric introduced Electro, a mechanical man, at the World's Fair in New York, robot fans have imagined a world filled with tireless robotic helpers, always on hand to wash dishes, do the laundry and handle the drudgery of everyday tasks. So far, however, such robots have proliferated in science fiction, but have proved rather more elusive in the real world. But optimists are now arguing that the success of the Roomba and of toys such as Aibo, Sony's robot dog, combined with the plunging cost of computer power, could mean that the long-awaited mass market for robots is finally within reach."
Trust me, I'm a robot - Robot safety: As robots move into homes and offices, ensuring that they do not injure people will be vital. But how? The Economist Technology Quarterly (June 8, 2006). "Last year there were 77 robot-related accidents in Britain alone, according to the Health and Safety Executive. With robots now poised to emerge from their industrial cages and to move into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences -- an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons -- the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily. ... According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly outstripping their industrial counterparts. ... So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? 'Not enough,' says Blay Whitby, an artificial-intelligence expert at the University of Sussex in England. ... Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. 'When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?' asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally 'yes'. But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says."
Robots/ Mechanical Life. NPR Talk of the Nation: Science Friday With Ira Flatow (August 30, 2002). "This week, an automated convenience store opened in Washington. This robo-mart dispenses snacks, toiletries, and even DVDs. From housekeeping to the battlefield to your neighborhood convenience store, researchers are creating robots to live with us and work for us. In this hour, we'll look at how robots may change our lives. Plus, early attempts to create mechanical life." Guests: Rodney Brooks & Gaby Wood. You can listen to the radio broadcast by clicking here.
The robot that thinks like you... Scientists built a robot that thinks like we do and set it loose to explore the world. New Scientist discovers what happened next By Douglas Fox. New Scientist (November 5, 2005; subscription req'd.; Issue 2524). "The infant I am watching wander around its rather spartan playpen in the Neurosciences Institute (NSI) in La Jolla, California, is a more limited creature. It is a trashcan-shaped robot called Darwin VII, and it has just 20,000 brain cells. Despite this, it has managed to master the abilities of a 18-month-old baby -- a pretty impressive feat for a machine. ... Darwin VII is the fourth in a series of robots that Jeff Krichmar and his colleagues at NSI have created in a quest to better understand how our own brains work. ... The idea of an artificial neural network that could perform computations was proposed as long ago as 1943, by Warren McCullough and Walter Pitts at the University of Illinois. ... [I]n the past few years, neuroscientists and AI researchers have started collaborating more closely, and their labours are beginning to bear fruit. Their conclusions challenge two decades of research into artificial neural networks."
Visit the %newwinNeurosciences Institute ... and meet Jeffrey L. Krichmar and Nomad & Darwin!
The Real Transformers - Researchers are programming robots to learn in humanlike ways and show humanlike traits. Could this be the beginning of robot consciousness -- and of a better understanding of ourselves? By Robin Marantz Henig. The New York Times Sunday Magazine (July 29, 2007 cover story). "I was introduced to my first sociable robot on a sunny afternoon in June. The robot, developed by graduate students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was named Mertz. ... "
What We Can Learn from Robots. By Gregory T. Huang. Technology Review (January 2005). "On a crisp October day last year, Carnegie Mellon Universityís Robotics Institute kicked off its 25th-anniversary celebration.... On the third day, it was Mitsuo Kawatoís turn to speak. The lights went down, and the director of the ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, made his way to the stage to the beat of rock music. ... [T] here is a difference between him and other attendees. Kawato loves robots not because they are cool, but because he believes they can teach him how the human brain works. 'Only when we try to reproduce brain functions in artificial machines can we understand the information processing of the brain,' he says. Itís what he calls 'understanding the brain by creating the brain.' By programming a robot to reach out and grasp an object, for instance, Kawato hopes to learn the patterns in which electrical signals flow among neurons in the brain to control a human arm. ... 'This is very different from the usual justification for building humanoid robots --- that they are economically useful or will help take care of the elderly,' says Christopher Atkeson, a robotics expert at Carnegie Mellon."
Bots on The Ground - In the Field of Battle (Or Even Above It), Robots Are a Soldier's Best Friend. By Joel Garreau The Washington Post (May 6, 2007). "The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have become an unprecedented field study in human relationships with intelligent machines. These conflicts are the first in history to see widespread deployment of thousands of battle bots. ... Even more startling than these machines' capabilities, however, are the effects they have on their friendly keepers who, for example, award their bots 'battlefield promotions' and 'purple hearts.' ... Humans have long displayed an uncanny ability to make emotional connections with their manufactured helpmates. ... Digital pets like the Tamagotchi or the Furby, designed to be cute, have long caused children to make spooky levels of connection. Sherry Turkle, founder of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, quotes kids describing intelligent machines as 'sort of alive.' ... Humans respond so readily to Kismet, created by Cynthia Breazeal, that graduate students working in the lab at night have been known to put up a curtain between themselves and the bot, [Rodney] Brooks reports. ... The 2 million personal bots in use around the world in 2004 are expected to grow to 7 million next year. The South Korean Ministry of Information and Communication hopes to put a bot in every home there within six years."
Robots get friendly - Robots are acting more like people. Will our attachments eventually become too strong? By Gregory M. Lamb. The Christian Science Monitor (February 5, 2003). "Of course, computers and their physical manifestations, robots, are already deeply embedded in our lives. In some sense, ATM machines, self-service gas pumps, and TiVo video recorders serve as rudimentary robots. Now, scientists are pushing to make these machines more sophisticated and humanlike, both in appearance [see related story] and intelligence. ... Some experts worry that attachments may become too strong [see the other related story: If you kick a robotic dog, is it wrong?], subjecting people to manipulation by clever programmers or unnatural reliance on machines for companionship."
Newsmaker interview with Rodney Brooks, director of MIT's CSAIL and CTO of iRobot: Sizing up the coming robotics revolution. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 15, 2007). "When it comes to robots, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab is one of the places in the world where the magic happens. Rodney Brooks is the Panasonic professor of robotics at MIT and the director of CSAIL. He is also the co-founder and chief technology officer of iRobot and one of the principal architects of iRobot's Roomba vacuum. On Tuesday, RoboBusiness 2007, an international conference showcasing consumer, commercial and military robots, will convene in Boston. To gain insight on what's in the pipeline, CNET News.com sat down with Brooks, one of the leading experts on robots and artificial intelligence. From his office at CSAIL, Brooks shared his thoughts on the best AI readily available today and the four things it will take for the magicians of science to match science fiction fantasies."
Newsmaker interview with Matt Mason, director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University - Roboticist inspired by more than machines. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 18, 2007). "On Tuesday, Matt Mason, the director of the Robotics Institute at CMU announced the 2007 inductees into the Robot Hall of Fame. The honor, which is judged by a jury of both leading science and science fiction experts, was created in April 2003 to call attention to the contributions robots and their creators make to society. Mason is known for his work on the mechanics of robot manipulation and has written four books on the topic. He spent some time with CNET News.com from the great glass hall of the Hynes Convention Center in Boston during RoboBusiness 2007."
Domestic bliss through mechanical marvels? By Kevin Maney. USA Today (September 1, 2004). "Never mind the humanoid Automated Domestic Assistants walking rich people's pets in the movie I, Robot, or the accordion-armed Robot B9 in TV classic Lost in Space warning of danger on lonely planets. The real force driving the development of personal robots -- and what will eventually create demand for them in the marketplace -- is aging baby boomers. That's the secret among robotics researchers and budding robot companies. As the horde of boomers become old, they increasingly will be unable to care for themselves or their homes. They'll face a social and medical system straining to help them. But they'll be comfortable with technology. ... Robots that are likely to serve the elderly seem to fall into three broad categories. Though the categories don't officially have names, you could call them homebots, carebots and joybots. A look at those categories speaks volumes about what's going on in robotics -- and what's still beyond technology's reach. ... 'Whether or not you have to love your robot is another question,' Brooks says. 'I don't need my ATM to be cute.' Here is a great point of departure between U.S. and Japanese robotics research. U.S. labs and companies generally approach robots as tools. The Japanese approach them as beings. That explains a lot about robot projects coming out of Japan."
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Robots - Modern robots can respond to emotion and the smell of fine wines. By Sean Markey and Corey S. Powell. Discover Magazine (April 2, 2007).
Getting a Grip - Building the Ultimate Robotic Hand. By Gregory Mone. Wired (Issue 15.12; December 2007). "A 6-foot-tall, one-armed robot named Stair 1.0 balances on a modified Segway platform in the doorway of a Stanford University conference room. ... From his seat at a polished table, roboticist Morgan Quigley sends the bot on a mission. 'Stair, please fetch the stapler from the lab.' ... To do real work in our offices and homes, to fetch our staplers or clean up our rooms, robots are going to have to master their hands. They'll need the kind of 'hand-eye' coordination that enables them to identify targets, guide their mechanical mitts toward them, and then manipulate the objects deftly. There's a growing need for robots with these skills. In Japan, the elder care industry is already employing robots as assistants. To keep seniors out of costly nursing homes, though, they need to be able to perform household chores like serving up a drink. Even that simple task will entail plucking a glass out of a crowded cupboard, finding and removing a bottle from a fridge, and then pouring the beverage from one container into the other. And the bot needs to do all this without spilling, dropping, or breaking anything. ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett [Technology]. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before.† ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before. ... As Europe's preeminent robotics facility and one of the world's epicenters of artificial intelligence research, [University of Genoa's Laboratory for Integrated Advanced Robotics is] dominated by eggheads staring at monitors. And, of course, there's an android hanging around the place. The size and shape of a 3-year-old, RobotCub has two five-fingered hands,"
Meet the robots:
STAIR: STanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (Stanford University)
Uman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst campus)
RobotCub consortium
Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendant Mind. By Hans Moravec (1998). New York: Oxford University Press. An adventurous look at the future in which the author sees intelligent machines surpassing their human creators as the next evolutionary step. The author's web page includes an in-depth look at the book. You may also want to read the transcript of a November 1998 interview with Hans Moravec.
The Scientific Relevance of Robotics (Remarks at the Dedication of the CMU Robotics Institute). By Allen Newell. AI Magazine 2(1): 24-26, 34 (Winter 1980). "My first point, then, is to remind you that science doesn't fit any single mold. ... From where I stand, it is easy to see the science lurking in robotics. It lies in the welding of intelligence to energy. That is, it lies in intelligent perception and intelligent control of motion."
Emotionware. By Lynellen D.S. Perry (1996). ACM Crossroads Student Magazine. "The capability of displaying emotion seems to be a critical component of creating intelligent agents with whom humans can comfortably relate and communicate. The emotional aspect distinguishes a dead machine from an agent who is believable, alive, and trustworthy."
The Intimate Machine. Scientific American Frontiers (October 22, 2002). "Scientists blend technology with sociology to make our machines more fun to use."
The programmable robot of ancient Greece. By Noel Sharkey (Professor of artificial intelligence and robotics at the University of Sheffield, UK. His forthcoming book is called The Tin Man). New Scientist (July 7, 2007; Issue 2611: pages 32-35; subscription req'd). "Constructing a mechanical lion that could walk, let alone present flowers to the king, can't have been a simple task back in 1515 - even for a genius like Leonardo da Vinci. How he managed this feat remained a mystery until 2000, when US robotics expert Mark Rosheim came to a surprising conclusion. ... [W]as da Vinci influenced by an earlier design? And if so, how far back in history can we trace programmable robots? In search of answers I followed the technology back through medieval Europe to the Islamic world, where I have found evidence of an even earlier programmable automaton, made in Baghdad by the brilliant 13th-century engineer Ibn Ismail Ibn al-Razzaz Al-Jazari. ... Yet the trail doesn't stop there. It led me even further back past the automata of the Byzantine court and ancient Rome to ancient Alexandria. It was here that Hero, one of the greatest Greek engineers, constructed a programmable robot that pre-dates da Vinci's by 1500 years. ... So what exactly do we mean by 'programmable'? ..."
Robots and the Rest of Us. View by Bruce Sterling. Wired Magazine (May 2004; Issue 12.05). "Since when do machines need an ethical code? For 80 years, visionaries have imagined robots that look like us, work like us, perceive the world, judge it, and take action on their own. The robot butler is still as mystical as the flying car, but there's trouble rising in the garage. In Nobel's vaulted ballroom, experts uneasily point out that automatons are challenging humankind on four fronts. First, this is a time of war. ... The prospect of autonomous weapons naturally raises ethical questions. ... The second ominous frontier is brain augmentation, best embodied by the remote-controlled rat recently created at SUNY Downstate in Brooklyn. ... Another troubling frontier is physical, as opposed to mental, augmentation. ... Frontier number four is social: human reaction to the troubling presence of the humanoid. ... If the [First International Symposium on Roboethics] offers a take-home message, it's not about robots, but about us."
Be sure to also visit our Ethical & Social Implications page.
Machine learning on physical robots [slide show with audio]. By Peter Stone, The University of Texas at Austin. Presented at the University of Pennsylvania's GRASP Lab's GRASP Seminar Series (March 31, 2006). Abstract: "As robot technology advances, we are approaching the day when robots will be deployed prevalently in uncontrolled, unpredictable environments: the proverbial 'real world.' As this happens, it will be essential for these robots to be able to adapt autonomously to their changing environment. For a robot to learn to improve its performance based entirely on real-world environmental feedback, the robot's behavior specification and learning algorithm must be constructed so as to enable data-efficient learning. This talk presents 3 examples of machine learning on physical robots. ..."
Man and machine - Part 1: the quest for mechanical man. By Dheera Sujan. Radio Netherlands (November 26, 2004). "In her book Edison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life, Gaby Wood documents the long history of humanity's fascination with mechanical representations of itself. And she poses the question - what do we want from a machine that simulates us? 'Is it supposed to be as close as possible to a human being, or to improve on that, and become superhuman? In the quest for mechanical perfection, does perfection mean infallibility (as in the computer), or innocence (as in the child)?' These questions have been around since the Enlightenment and the dawn of the age of machines; now researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence are returning to them as they gain renewed relevance. ... At what pointpoint does a humanoid machine achieve personhood? Dr [Anne] Foerst's search for an answer to this question has led her through a philosophical maze that has forced her to examine her own ideas on what it means to be alive. ... Fear has always been part of the fascination we have for the idea of reproducing ourselves mechanically. According to Dr Foerst, however, that won't happen if we take responsibility for our creation. After all, Dr Frankenstein didn't create a monster; the creature (never dignified with a name) only became a monster when he was rejected by his creator and the rest of mankind." ‘’You can listen to the broadcast via a link on the page.’’
Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals. By Juyang Weng, James McClelland, Alex Pentland, Olaf Sporns, Ida Stockman, Mriganka Sur, Esther Thelen. (2000). , Science, Vol. 291, No. 5504; pages 599 - 600, 26 January 2001). "How does one create an intelligent machine? This problem has proven difficult. Over the past several decades, scientists have taken one of three approaches: In the first, which is knowledge-based, an intelligent machine in a laboratory is directly programmed to perform a given task. In a second, learning-based approach, a computer is 'spoon-fed' human-edited sensory data while the machine is controlled by a task-specific learning program. Finally, by a 'genetic search,' robots have evolved through generations by the principle of survival of the fittest, mostly in a computer-simulated virtual world. Although notable, none of these is powerful enough to lead to machines having the complex, diverse, and highly integrated capabilities of an adult brain, such as vision, speech, and language. Nevertheless, these traditional approaches have served as the incubator for the birth and growth of a new direction for machine intelligence: autonomous mental development."
Also see: Developmental Robotics - A 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium.
WTEC [World Technology Evaluation Center] Study on International Research and Development in Robotics. "The purpose of this study is to gather information on worldwide status and trends in robotics R&D and disseminate it to government decision-makers and the research community. The study panelists will gather information on robotics R&D abroad useful to the U.S. government in its own R&D programs, and to critically analyze and compare the research in the United States with that being pursued in Japan, Korea, and Europe."
Proceedings of the U.S. review workshop held at the National Science Foundation on July 21-22, 2004: Review of U.S. Research in Robotics. The 6 research areas addressed are:
Network Robotics; Multi-Robot Systems; Sensor Networks, Environmental
Medical Robotics; Biological Applications; Bio/Pharmaceutical ; Assisitive/Rehabilitative
Cognitive Human-Robot Interaction (CHRI); Physical HRI (PHRI); Humanoids; Entertainment; Personal/Service; Educational
Space; Field; Military Applications; Underwater; UAV
Actuators/Mechanisms; Bio/Nano/Mems; Industrial Applications
Perception (Sensing, Vision, Imaging); Control, Architecture, and Learning; Navigation/Mapping
Also see this exhibit from the National Science Foundation which complements the final report of September 16, 2005.
Meet Some Robots
Robots! A website from The University of Birmingham. "Explore our site to find all about the real robots that we build - sporty robots, clever robots, smiley robots, and ... ooo, those pesky robots! Ask your questions about robots to our expert - Professor Robotnik! Read about robo-pets and robo-footballers! Build your own robots!"
Among the questions that have been asked of the Prof are "How can I build a robot that has a human personality?" and "What is a robot?"
Be sure to see their richly illustrated History of Robotics.
Robots, a CBBC Newsround Guide: *What is a robot? *Robots in films *Award winning robots *Robot gadgets and toys *What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? *The world's most powerful computer *Robots then and now *Robots in the future *Robots in space.
Another helpful resource from the the BBC is the Robotics section of the Ask a Teacher feature of BBC Education Scotland's Standard Grade Bitesize site.
Examining the Sensitive Side of Robots. [Radio broadcast.] NPR's Talk of the Nation (March 21, 2007). "Science fiction and pop culture have conspired to make most of us think of robots as something out of Terminator or I, Robot. But after six years of behind-the-scenes reporting from the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Lee Gutkind knows better. Gutkind, the founder and editor of the literary journal Creative Nonfiction, examines the subculture surrounding these mechanical creatures in a new book, Almost Human: Making Robots Think. He found that today's robots are more fun than ferocious, and scientists are making wires and chips increasingly human-like. Gutkind talks with Neal Conan about the sensitive side of robots."
Also see: Outsized effort powers robots in 'Almost Human.' Book review by David Templeton. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (March 14, 2007). "[I]t's the dramatic tale of Carnegie Mellon University roboticists working to build robots that feature human-like abilities when they move, see, record, learn, and even understand. Lee Gutkind, the self-described 'godfather of creative nonfiction,' tells their story in his latest book that provides an inside look into Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute. 'Almost Human: Making Robots Think,' the 320-page book published by WW Norton.... 'It's a great test of character to get them to work,' Mr. Gutkind said of robots that do not make good eye contact with humans. 'The main thesis is that young people are making things happen.'"
The Humanoid Race - Machines are getting more and more like the rest of us. A piece-by-piece guide to the globe's most advanced bots. By Robert Capps. Wired Magazine (July 2004; Issue 12.07). "With each advance in computing speed, battery capacity, camera and motor miniaturization, and software capability, the world grows closer to the ultimate goal of robotics: a walking, talking, feeling android worthy of our cinematic inspirations. Consider the progress of just the past 15 years. There are now robots that can get around on two legs, participate in simple conversations, and manipulate objects in rudimentary ways. ... And while there are a number of extremely complex problems to solve before we can make something as advanced as Sonny, the star of I, Robot, we're getting there, one piece at a time. To find out where the state of the art lies, Wired surveyed the projects that might one day add up to an android just like the rest of us. "
Ethics for the Robot Age - Should bots carry weapons? Should they win patents? Questions we must answer as automation advances. View by Jordan Pollack. Wired Magazine (January 2005; Issue 13.01). "My definition of a robot is any device controlled by software that can work 24/7 and put people out of work. The machines are not intelligent. ... In case you missed them, today's most popular robots are ATMs and computer printers. While our hopes for and fears of robots may be overblown, there is plenty to worry about as automation progresses. The future will have many more robots, and they'll most certainly be much more advanced. This raises important ethical questions that we must begin to confront. 1. Should robots be humanoid? ... 2. Should humans become robots? ... 4. Should robots eat? ... 6. Should robots carry weapons? ..."
Also see our Ethical and Social Implications and Science Fiction pages.
Robocup "is an international research and education initiative. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined, as well as being used for integrated project-oriented education." Links to soccer and rescue competitions and to a library of videos.
Robots and Robotics in Undergraduate AI Education. AI Magazine 27(1), Spring 2006.
Overview of Research Challenges -- summary of four workshops sponsored by The Computing Community Consortium. February, 2009.
The Robots Among Us - If robotics technology now stands where computing did in the '70s, what can we expect in the future? By Tom Abate. San Francisco Chronicle (December 7, 2007). "It may seem like a science fiction leap to go from the dust-sucking Roomba to the walking, talking machines of movie and television fame. But David Calkins, 39, director of the San Francisco State University Robotics Institute, says it isn't so much that the robots are coming as that they are already working for us under different names. 'Why do we call a Roomba a robot and not a dishwasher?' asks Calkins, arguing that we already rely on increasingly clever special-purpose devices and programs such as search engines, which use rudimentary artificial intelligence to answer queries and rank replies. ... 'It's a problem of definitions,' says Calkins. 'People use the r-word to mean so many different things.'"
The 50 Best Robots Ever. By Robert Capps. Wired (January 2006; Issue 14.01). "They're exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They're saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They're transforming factory floors and filmmaking. They're - oh c'mon, they're just plain cool! From Qrio to the Terminator, here are our absolute favorites (at least for now)."
Meet Penelope at the Robotic Surgical Tech, Inc. web site.
The gentle rise of the machines. Robotics - The science-fiction dream that robots would one day become a part of everyday life was absurd. Or was it? The Economist Technology Quarterly (March 11, 2004). "Since 1939, when Westinghouse Electric introduced Electro, a mechanical man, at the World's Fair in New York, robot fans have imagined a world filled with tireless robotic helpers, always on hand to wash dishes, do the laundry and handle the drudgery of everyday tasks. So far, however, such robots have proliferated in science fiction, but have proved rather more elusive in the real world. But optimists are now arguing that the success of the Roomba and of toys such as Aibo, Sony's robot dog, combined with the plunging cost of computer power, could mean that the long-awaited mass market for robots is finally within reach."
Trust me, I'm a robot - Robot safety: As robots move into homes and offices, ensuring that they do not injure people will be vital. But how? The Economist Technology Quarterly (June 8, 2006). "Last year there were 77 robot-related accidents in Britain alone, according to the Health and Safety Executive. With robots now poised to emerge from their industrial cages and to move into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences -- an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons -- the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily. ... According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly outstripping their industrial counterparts. ... So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? 'Not enough,' says Blay Whitby, an artificial-intelligence expert at the University of Sussex in England. ... Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. 'When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?' asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally 'yes'. But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says."
Robots/ Mechanical Life. NPR Talk of the Nation: Science Friday With Ira Flatow (August 30, 2002). "This week, an automated convenience store opened in Washington. This robo-mart dispenses snacks, toiletries, and even DVDs. From housekeeping to the battlefield to your neighborhood convenience store, researchers are creating robots to live with us and work for us. In this hour, we'll look at how robots may change our lives. Plus, early attempts to create mechanical life." Guests: Rodney Brooks & Gaby Wood. You can listen to the radio broadcast by clicking here.
The robot that thinks like you... Scientists built a robot that thinks like we do and set it loose to explore the world. New Scientist discovers what happened next By Douglas Fox. New Scientist (November 5, 2005; subscription req'd.; Issue 2524). "The infant I am watching wander around its rather spartan playpen in the Neurosciences Institute (NSI) in La Jolla, California, is a more limited creature. It is a trashcan-shaped robot called Darwin VII, and it has just 20,000 brain cells. Despite this, it has managed to master the abilities of a 18-month-old baby -- a pretty impressive feat for a machine. ... Darwin VII is the fourth in a series of robots that Jeff Krichmar and his colleagues at NSI have created in a quest to better understand how our own brains work. ... The idea of an artificial neural network that could perform computations was proposed as long ago as 1943, by Warren McCullough and Walter Pitts at the University of Illinois. ... [I]n the past few years, neuroscientists and AI researchers have started collaborating more closely, and their labours are beginning to bear fruit. Their conclusions challenge two decades of research into artificial neural networks."
Visit the %newwinNeurosciences Institute ... and meet Jeffrey L. Krichmar and Nomad & Darwin!
The Real Transformers - Researchers are programming robots to learn in humanlike ways and show humanlike traits. Could this be the beginning of robot consciousness -- and of a better understanding of ourselves? By Robin Marantz Henig. The New York Times Sunday Magazine (July 29, 2007 cover story). "I was introduced to my first sociable robot on a sunny afternoon in June. The robot, developed by graduate students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was named Mertz. ... "
What We Can Learn from Robots. By Gregory T. Huang. Technology Review (January 2005). "On a crisp October day last year, Carnegie Mellon Universityís Robotics Institute kicked off its 25th-anniversary celebration.... On the third day, it was Mitsuo Kawatoís turn to speak. The lights went down, and the director of the ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, made his way to the stage to the beat of rock music. ... [T] here is a difference between him and other attendees. Kawato loves robots not because they are cool, but because he believes they can teach him how the human brain works. 'Only when we try to reproduce brain functions in artificial machines can we understand the information processing of the brain,' he says. Itís what he calls 'understanding the brain by creating the brain.' By programming a robot to reach out and grasp an object, for instance, Kawato hopes to learn the patterns in which electrical signals flow among neurons in the brain to control a human arm. ... 'This is very different from the usual justification for building humanoid robots --- that they are economically useful or will help take care of the elderly,' says Christopher Atkeson, a robotics expert at Carnegie Mellon."
Bots on The Ground - In the Field of Battle (Or Even Above It), Robots Are a Soldier's Best Friend. By Joel Garreau The Washington Post (May 6, 2007). "The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have become an unprecedented field study in human relationships with intelligent machines. These conflicts are the first in history to see widespread deployment of thousands of battle bots. ... Even more startling than these machines' capabilities, however, are the effects they have on their friendly keepers who, for example, award their bots 'battlefield promotions' and 'purple hearts.' ... Humans have long displayed an uncanny ability to make emotional connections with their manufactured helpmates. ... Digital pets like the Tamagotchi or the Furby, designed to be cute, have long caused children to make spooky levels of connection. Sherry Turkle, founder of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, quotes kids describing intelligent machines as 'sort of alive.' ... Humans respond so readily to Kismet, created by Cynthia Breazeal, that graduate students working in the lab at night have been known to put up a curtain between themselves and the bot, [Rodney] Brooks reports. ... The 2 million personal bots in use around the world in 2004 are expected to grow to 7 million next year. The South Korean Ministry of Information and Communication hopes to put a bot in every home there within six years."
Robots get friendly - Robots are acting more like people. Will our attachments eventually become too strong? By Gregory M. Lamb. The Christian Science Monitor (February 5, 2003). "Of course, computers and their physical manifestations, robots, are already deeply embedded in our lives. In some sense, ATM machines, self-service gas pumps, and TiVo video recorders serve as rudimentary robots. Now, scientists are pushing to make these machines more sophisticated and humanlike, both in appearance [see related story] and intelligence. ... Some experts worry that attachments may become too strong [see the other related story: If you kick a robotic dog, is it wrong?], subjecting people to manipulation by clever programmers or unnatural reliance on machines for companionship."
Newsmaker interview with Rodney Brooks, director of MIT's CSAIL and CTO of iRobot: Sizing up the coming robotics revolution. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 15, 2007). "When it comes to robots, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab is one of the places in the world where the magic happens. Rodney Brooks is the Panasonic professor of robotics at MIT and the director of CSAIL. He is also the co-founder and chief technology officer of iRobot and one of the principal architects of iRobot's Roomba vacuum. On Tuesday, RoboBusiness 2007, an international conference showcasing consumer, commercial and military robots, will convene in Boston. To gain insight on what's in the pipeline, CNET News.com sat down with Brooks, one of the leading experts on robots and artificial intelligence. From his office at CSAIL, Brooks shared his thoughts on the best AI readily available today and the four things it will take for the magicians of science to match science fiction fantasies."
Newsmaker interview with Matt Mason, director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University - Roboticist inspired by more than machines. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 18, 2007). "On Tuesday, Matt Mason, the director of the Robotics Institute at CMU announced the 2007 inductees into the Robot Hall of Fame. The honor, which is judged by a jury of both leading science and science fiction experts, was created in April 2003 to call attention to the contributions robots and their creators make to society. Mason is known for his work on the mechanics of robot manipulation and has written four books on the topic. He spent some time with CNET News.com from the great glass hall of the Hynes Convention Center in Boston during RoboBusiness 2007."
Domestic bliss through mechanical marvels? By Kevin Maney. USA Today (September 1, 2004). "Never mind the humanoid Automated Domestic Assistants walking rich people's pets in the movie I, Robot, or the accordion-armed Robot B9 in TV classic Lost in Space warning of danger on lonely planets. The real force driving the development of personal robots -- and what will eventually create demand for them in the marketplace -- is aging baby boomers. That's the secret among robotics researchers and budding robot companies. As the horde of boomers become old, they increasingly will be unable to care for themselves or their homes. They'll face a social and medical system straining to help them. But they'll be comfortable with technology. ... Robots that are likely to serve the elderly seem to fall into three broad categories. Though the categories don't officially have names, you could call them homebots, carebots and joybots. A look at those categories speaks volumes about what's going on in robotics -- and what's still beyond technology's reach. ... 'Whether or not you have to love your robot is another question,' Brooks says. 'I don't need my ATM to be cute.' Here is a great point of departure between U.S. and Japanese robotics research. U.S. labs and companies generally approach robots as tools. The Japanese approach them as beings. That explains a lot about robot projects coming out of Japan."
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Robots - Modern robots can respond to emotion and the smell of fine wines. By Sean Markey and Corey S. Powell. Discover Magazine (April 2, 2007).
Getting a Grip - Building the Ultimate Robotic Hand. By Gregory Mone. Wired (Issue 15.12; December 2007). "A 6-foot-tall, one-armed robot named Stair 1.0 balances on a modified Segway platform in the doorway of a Stanford University conference room. ... From his seat at a polished table, roboticist Morgan Quigley sends the bot on a mission. 'Stair, please fetch the stapler from the lab.' ... To do real work in our offices and homes, to fetch our staplers or clean up our rooms, robots are going to have to master their hands. They'll need the kind of 'hand-eye' coordination that enables them to identify targets, guide their mechanical mitts toward them, and then manipulate the objects deftly. There's a growing need for robots with these skills. In Japan, the elder care industry is already employing robots as assistants. To keep seniors out of costly nursing homes, though, they need to be able to perform household chores like serving up a drink. Even that simple task will entail plucking a glass out of a crowded cupboard, finding and removing a bottle from a fridge, and then pouring the beverage from one container into the other. And the bot needs to do all this without spilling, dropping, or breaking anything. ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett [Technology]. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before.† ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before. ... As Europe's preeminent robotics facility and one of the world's epicenters of artificial intelligence research, [University of Genoa's Laboratory for Integrated Advanced Robotics is] dominated by eggheads staring at monitors. And, of course, there's an android hanging around the place. The size and shape of a 3-year-old, RobotCub has two five-fingered hands,"
Meet the robots:
STAIR: STanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (Stanford University)
Uman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst campus)
RobotCub consortium
Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendant Mind. By Hans Moravec (1998). New York: Oxford University Press. An adventurous look at the future in which the author sees intelligent machines surpassing their human creators as the next evolutionary step. The author's web page includes an in-depth look at the book. You may also want to read the transcript of a November 1998 interview with Hans Moravec.
The Scientific Relevance of Robotics (Remarks at the Dedication of the CMU Robotics Institute). By Allen Newell. AI Magazine 2(1): 24-26, 34 (Winter 1980). "My first point, then, is to remind you that science doesn't fit any single mold. ... From where I stand, it is easy to see the science lurking in robotics. It lies in the welding of intelligence to energy. That is, it lies in intelligent perception and intelligent control of motion."
Emotionware. By Lynellen D.S. Perry (1996). ACM Crossroads Student Magazine. "The capability of displaying emotion seems to be a critical component of creating intelligent agents with whom humans can comfortably relate and communicate. The emotional aspect distinguishes a dead machine from an agent who is believable, alive, and trustworthy."
The Intimate Machine. Scientific American Frontiers (October 22, 2002). "Scientists blend technology with sociology to make our machines more fun to use."
The programmable robot of ancient Greece. By Noel Sharkey (Professor of artificial intelligence and robotics at the University of Sheffield, UK. His forthcoming book is called The Tin Man). New Scientist (July 7, 2007; Issue 2611: pages 32-35; subscription req'd). "Constructing a mechanical lion that could walk, let alone present flowers to the king, can't have been a simple task back in 1515 - even for a genius like Leonardo da Vinci. How he managed this feat remained a mystery until 2000, when US robotics expert Mark Rosheim came to a surprising conclusion. ... [W]as da Vinci influenced by an earlier design? And if so, how far back in history can we trace programmable robots? In search of answers I followed the technology back through medieval Europe to the Islamic world, where I have found evidence of an even earlier programmable automaton, made in Baghdad by the brilliant 13th-century engineer Ibn Ismail Ibn al-Razzaz Al-Jazari. ... Yet the trail doesn't stop there. It led me even further back past the automata of the Byzantine court and ancient Rome to ancient Alexandria. It was here that Hero, one of the greatest Greek engineers, constructed a programmable robot that pre-dates da Vinci's by 1500 years. ... So what exactly do we mean by 'programmable'? ..."
Robots and the Rest of Us. View by Bruce Sterling. Wired Magazine (May 2004; Issue 12.05). "Since when do machines need an ethical code? For 80 years, visionaries have imagined robots that look like us, work like us, perceive the world, judge it, and take action on their own. The robot butler is still as mystical as the flying car, but there's trouble rising in the garage. In Nobel's vaulted ballroom, experts uneasily point out that automatons are challenging humankind on four fronts. First, this is a time of war. ... The prospect of autonomous weapons naturally raises ethical questions. ... The second ominous frontier is brain augmentation, best embodied by the remote-controlled rat recently created at SUNY Downstate in Brooklyn. ... Another troubling frontier is physical, as opposed to mental, augmentation. ... Frontier number four is social: human reaction to the troubling presence of the humanoid. ... If the [First International Symposium on Roboethics] offers a take-home message, it's not about robots, but about us."
Be sure to also visit our Ethical & Social Implications page.
Machine learning on physical robots [slide show with audio]. By Peter Stone, The University of Texas at Austin. Presented at the University of Pennsylvania's GRASP Lab's GRASP Seminar Series (March 31, 2006). Abstract: "As robot technology advances, we are approaching the day when robots will be deployed prevalently in uncontrolled, unpredictable environments: the proverbial 'real world.' As this happens, it will be essential for these robots to be able to adapt autonomously to their changing environment. For a robot to learn to improve its performance based entirely on real-world environmental feedback, the robot's behavior specification and learning algorithm must be constructed so as to enable data-efficient learning. This talk presents 3 examples of machine learning on physical robots. ..."
Man and machine - Part 1: the quest for mechanical man. By Dheera Sujan. Radio Netherlands (November 26, 2004). "In her book Edison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life, Gaby Wood documents the long history of humanity's fascination with mechanical representations of itself. And she poses the question - what do we want from a machine that simulates us? 'Is it supposed to be as close as possible to a human being, or to improve on that, and become superhuman? In the quest for mechanical perfection, does perfection mean infallibility (as in the computer), or innocence (as in the child)?' These questions have been around since the Enlightenment and the dawn of the age of machines; now researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence are returning to them as they gain renewed relevance. ... At what pointpoint does a humanoid machine achieve personhood? Dr [Anne] Foerst's search for an answer to this question has led her through a philosophical maze that has forced her to examine her own ideas on what it means to be alive. ... Fear has always been part of the fascination we have for the idea of reproducing ourselves mechanically. According to Dr Foerst, however, that won't happen if we take responsibility for our creation. After all, Dr Frankenstein didn't create a monster; the creature (never dignified with a name) only became a monster when he was rejected by his creator and the rest of mankind." ‘’You can listen to the broadcast via a link on the page.’’
Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals. By Juyang Weng, James McClelland, Alex Pentland, Olaf Sporns, Ida Stockman, Mriganka Sur, Esther Thelen. (2000). , Science, Vol. 291, No. 5504; pages 599 - 600, 26 January 2001). "How does one create an intelligent machine? This problem has proven difficult. Over the past several decades, scientists have taken one of three approaches: In the first, which is knowledge-based, an intelligent machine in a laboratory is directly programmed to perform a given task. In a second, learning-based approach, a computer is 'spoon-fed' human-edited sensory data while the machine is controlled by a task-specific learning program. Finally, by a 'genetic search,' robots have evolved through generations by the principle of survival of the fittest, mostly in a computer-simulated virtual world. Although notable, none of these is powerful enough to lead to machines having the complex, diverse, and highly integrated capabilities of an adult brain, such as vision, speech, and language. Nevertheless, these traditional approaches have served as the incubator for the birth and growth of a new direction for machine intelligence: autonomous mental development."
Also see: Developmental Robotics - A 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium.
WTEC [World Technology Evaluation Center] Study on International Research and Development in Robotics. "The purpose of this study is to gather information on worldwide status and trends in robotics R&D and disseminate it to government decision-makers and the research community. The study panelists will gather information on robotics R&D abroad useful to the U.S. government in its own R&D programs, and to critically analyze and compare the research in the United States with that being pursued in Japan, Korea, and Europe."
Proceedings of the U.S. review workshop held at the National Science Foundation on July 21-22, 2004: Review of U.S. Research in Robotics. The 6 research areas addressed are:
Network Robotics; Multi-Robot Systems; Sensor Networks, Environmental
Medical Robotics; Biological Applications; Bio/Pharmaceutical ; Assisitive/Rehabilitative
Cognitive Human-Robot Interaction (CHRI); Physical HRI (PHRI); Humanoids; Entertainment; Personal/Service; Educational
Space; Field; Military Applications; Underwater; UAV
Actuators/Mechanisms; Bio/Nano/Mems; Industrial Applications
Perception (Sensing, Vision, Imaging); Control, Architecture, and Learning; Navigation/Mapping
Also see this exhibit from the National Science Foundation which complements the final report of September 16, 2005.
Meet Some Robots
Among the questions that have been asked of the Prof are "How can I build a robot that has a human personality?" and "What is a robot?"
Be sure to see their richly illustrated History of Robotics.
Robots, a CBBC Newsround Guide: *What is a robot? *Robots in films *Award winning robots *Robot gadgets and toys *What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? *The world's most powerful computer *Robots then and now *Robots in the future *Robots in space.
Another helpful resource from the the BBC is the Robotics section of the Ask a Teacher feature of BBC Education Scotland's Standard Grade Bitesize site.
Examining the Sensitive Side of Robots. [Radio broadcast.] NPR's Talk of the Nation (March 21, 2007). "Science fiction and pop culture have conspired to make most of us think of robots as something out of Terminator or I, Robot. But after six years of behind-the-scenes reporting from the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Lee Gutkind knows better. Gutkind, the founder and editor of the literary journal Creative Nonfiction, examines the subculture surrounding these mechanical creatures in a new book, Almost Human: Making Robots Think. He found that today's robots are more fun than ferocious, and scientists are making wires and chips increasingly human-like. Gutkind talks with Neal Conan about the sensitive side of robots."
Also see: Outsized effort powers robots in 'Almost Human.' Book review by David Templeton. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (March 14, 2007). "[I]t's the dramatic tale of Carnegie Mellon University roboticists working to build robots that feature human-like abilities when they move, see, record, learn, and even understand. Lee Gutkind, the self-described 'godfather of creative nonfiction,' tells their story in his latest book that provides an inside look into Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute. 'Almost Human: Making Robots Think,' the 320-page book published by WW Norton.... 'It's a great test of character to get them to work,' Mr. Gutkind said of robots that do not make good eye contact with humans. 'The main thesis is that young people are making things happen.'"
The Humanoid Race - Machines are getting more and more like the rest of us. A piece-by-piece guide to the globe's most advanced bots. By Robert Capps. Wired Magazine (July 2004; Issue 12.07). "With each advance in computing speed, battery capacity, camera and motor miniaturization, and software capability, the world grows closer to the ultimate goal of robotics: a walking, talking, feeling android worthy of our cinematic inspirations. Consider the progress of just the past 15 years. There are now robots that can get around on two legs, participate in simple conversations, and manipulate objects in rudimentary ways. ... And while there are a number of extremely complex problems to solve before we can make something as advanced as Sonny, the star of I, Robot, we're getting there, one piece at a time. To find out where the state of the art lies, Wired surveyed the projects that might one day add up to an android just like the rest of us. "
Ethics for the Robot Age - Should bots carry weapons? Should they win patents? Questions we must answer as automation advances. View by Jordan Pollack. Wired Magazine (January 2005; Issue 13.01). "My definition of a robot is any device controlled by software that can work 24/7 and put people out of work. The machines are not intelligent. ... In case you missed them, today's most popular robots are ATMs and computer printers. While our hopes for and fears of robots may be overblown, there is plenty to worry about as automation progresses. The future will have many more robots, and they'll most certainly be much more advanced. This raises important ethical questions that we must begin to confront. 1. Should robots be humanoid? ... 2. Should humans become robots? ... 4. Should robots eat? ... 6. Should robots carry weapons? ..."
Also see our Ethical and Social Implications and Science Fiction pages.
Robocup "is an international research and education initiative. It is an attempt to foster AI and intelligent robotics research by providing a standard problem where wide range of technologies can be integrated and examined, as well as being used for integrated project-oriented education." Links to soccer and rescue competitions and to a library of videos.
Robots and Robotics in Undergraduate AI Education. AI Magazine 27(1), Spring 2006.
Overview of Research Challenges -- summary of four workshops sponsored by The Computing Community Consortium. February, 2009.
The Robots Among Us - If robotics technology now stands where computing did in the '70s, what can we expect in the future? By Tom Abate. San Francisco Chronicle (December 7, 2007). "It may seem like a science fiction leap to go from the dust-sucking Roomba to the walking, talking machines of movie and television fame. But David Calkins, 39, director of the San Francisco State University Robotics Institute, says it isn't so much that the robots are coming as that they are already working for us under different names. 'Why do we call a Roomba a robot and not a dishwasher?' asks Calkins, arguing that we already rely on increasingly clever special-purpose devices and programs such as search engines, which use rudimentary artificial intelligence to answer queries and rank replies. ... 'It's a problem of definitions,' says Calkins. 'People use the r-word to mean so many different things.'"
The 50 Best Robots Ever. By Robert Capps. Wired (January 2006; Issue 14.01). "They're exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They're saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They're transforming factory floors and filmmaking. They're - oh c'mon, they're just plain cool! From Qrio to the Terminator, here are our absolute favorites (at least for now)."
Meet Penelope at the Robotic Surgical Tech, Inc. web site.
The gentle rise of the machines. Robotics - The science-fiction dream that robots would one day become a part of everyday life was absurd. Or was it? The Economist Technology Quarterly (March 11, 2004). "Since 1939, when Westinghouse Electric introduced Electro, a mechanical man, at the World's Fair in New York, robot fans have imagined a world filled with tireless robotic helpers, always on hand to wash dishes, do the laundry and handle the drudgery of everyday tasks. So far, however, such robots have proliferated in science fiction, but have proved rather more elusive in the real world. But optimists are now arguing that the success of the Roomba and of toys such as Aibo, Sony's robot dog, combined with the plunging cost of computer power, could mean that the long-awaited mass market for robots is finally within reach."
Trust me, I'm a robot - Robot safety: As robots move into homes and offices, ensuring that they do not injure people will be vital. But how? The Economist Technology Quarterly (June 8, 2006). "Last year there were 77 robot-related accidents in Britain alone, according to the Health and Safety Executive. With robots now poised to emerge from their industrial cages and to move into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences -- an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons -- the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily. ... According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly outstripping their industrial counterparts. ... So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? 'Not enough,' says Blay Whitby, an artificial-intelligence expert at the University of Sussex in England. ... Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. 'When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?' asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally 'yes'. But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says."
Robots/ Mechanical Life. NPR Talk of the Nation: Science Friday With Ira Flatow (August 30, 2002). "This week, an automated convenience store opened in Washington. This robo-mart dispenses snacks, toiletries, and even DVDs. From housekeeping to the battlefield to your neighborhood convenience store, researchers are creating robots to live with us and work for us. In this hour, we'll look at how robots may change our lives. Plus, early attempts to create mechanical life." Guests: Rodney Brooks & Gaby Wood. You can listen to the radio broadcast by clicking here.
The robot that thinks like you... Scientists built a robot that thinks like we do and set it loose to explore the world. New Scientist discovers what happened next By Douglas Fox. New Scientist (November 5, 2005; subscription req'd.; Issue 2524). "The infant I am watching wander around its rather spartan playpen in the Neurosciences Institute (NSI) in La Jolla, California, is a more limited creature. It is a trashcan-shaped robot called Darwin VII, and it has just 20,000 brain cells. Despite this, it has managed to master the abilities of a 18-month-old baby -- a pretty impressive feat for a machine. ... Darwin VII is the fourth in a series of robots that Jeff Krichmar and his colleagues at NSI have created in a quest to better understand how our own brains work. ... The idea of an artificial neural network that could perform computations was proposed as long ago as 1943, by Warren McCullough and Walter Pitts at the University of Illinois. ... [I]n the past few years, neuroscientists and AI researchers have started collaborating more closely, and their labours are beginning to bear fruit. Their conclusions challenge two decades of research into artificial neural networks."
Visit the %newwinNeurosciences Institute ... and meet Jeffrey L. Krichmar and Nomad & Darwin!
The Real Transformers - Researchers are programming robots to learn in humanlike ways and show humanlike traits. Could this be the beginning of robot consciousness -- and of a better understanding of ourselves? By Robin Marantz Henig. The New York Times Sunday Magazine (July 29, 2007 cover story). "I was introduced to my first sociable robot on a sunny afternoon in June. The robot, developed by graduate students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was named Mertz. ... "
What We Can Learn from Robots. By Gregory T. Huang. Technology Review (January 2005). "On a crisp October day last year, Carnegie Mellon Universityís Robotics Institute kicked off its 25th-anniversary celebration.... On the third day, it was Mitsuo Kawatoís turn to speak. The lights went down, and the director of the ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, made his way to the stage to the beat of rock music. ... [T] here is a difference between him and other attendees. Kawato loves robots not because they are cool, but because he believes they can teach him how the human brain works. 'Only when we try to reproduce brain functions in artificial machines can we understand the information processing of the brain,' he says. Itís what he calls 'understanding the brain by creating the brain.' By programming a robot to reach out and grasp an object, for instance, Kawato hopes to learn the patterns in which electrical signals flow among neurons in the brain to control a human arm. ... 'This is very different from the usual justification for building humanoid robots --- that they are economically useful or will help take care of the elderly,' says Christopher Atkeson, a robotics expert at Carnegie Mellon."
Bots on The Ground - In the Field of Battle (Or Even Above It), Robots Are a Soldier's Best Friend. By Joel Garreau The Washington Post (May 6, 2007). "The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have become an unprecedented field study in human relationships with intelligent machines. These conflicts are the first in history to see widespread deployment of thousands of battle bots. ... Even more startling than these machines' capabilities, however, are the effects they have on their friendly keepers who, for example, award their bots 'battlefield promotions' and 'purple hearts.' ... Humans have long displayed an uncanny ability to make emotional connections with their manufactured helpmates. ... Digital pets like the Tamagotchi or the Furby, designed to be cute, have long caused children to make spooky levels of connection. Sherry Turkle, founder of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, quotes kids describing intelligent machines as 'sort of alive.' ... Humans respond so readily to Kismet, created by Cynthia Breazeal, that graduate students working in the lab at night have been known to put up a curtain between themselves and the bot, [Rodney] Brooks reports. ... The 2 million personal bots in use around the world in 2004 are expected to grow to 7 million next year. The South Korean Ministry of Information and Communication hopes to put a bot in every home there within six years."
Robots get friendly - Robots are acting more like people. Will our attachments eventually become too strong? By Gregory M. Lamb. The Christian Science Monitor (February 5, 2003). "Of course, computers and their physical manifestations, robots, are already deeply embedded in our lives. In some sense, ATM machines, self-service gas pumps, and TiVo video recorders serve as rudimentary robots. Now, scientists are pushing to make these machines more sophisticated and humanlike, both in appearance [see related story] and intelligence. ... Some experts worry that attachments may become too strong [see the other related story: If you kick a robotic dog, is it wrong?], subjecting people to manipulation by clever programmers or unnatural reliance on machines for companionship."
Newsmaker interview with Rodney Brooks, director of MIT's CSAIL and CTO of iRobot: Sizing up the coming robotics revolution. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 15, 2007). "When it comes to robots, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab is one of the places in the world where the magic happens. Rodney Brooks is the Panasonic professor of robotics at MIT and the director of CSAIL. He is also the co-founder and chief technology officer of iRobot and one of the principal architects of iRobot's Roomba vacuum. On Tuesday, RoboBusiness 2007, an international conference showcasing consumer, commercial and military robots, will convene in Boston. To gain insight on what's in the pipeline, CNET News.com sat down with Brooks, one of the leading experts on robots and artificial intelligence. From his office at CSAIL, Brooks shared his thoughts on the best AI readily available today and the four things it will take for the magicians of science to match science fiction fantasies."
Newsmaker interview with Matt Mason, director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University - Roboticist inspired by more than machines. By Candace Lombardi. CNET News.com (May 18, 2007). "On Tuesday, Matt Mason, the director of the Robotics Institute at CMU announced the 2007 inductees into the Robot Hall of Fame. The honor, which is judged by a jury of both leading science and science fiction experts, was created in April 2003 to call attention to the contributions robots and their creators make to society. Mason is known for his work on the mechanics of robot manipulation and has written four books on the topic. He spent some time with CNET News.com from the great glass hall of the Hynes Convention Center in Boston during RoboBusiness 2007."
Domestic bliss through mechanical marvels? By Kevin Maney. USA Today (September 1, 2004). "Never mind the humanoid Automated Domestic Assistants walking rich people's pets in the movie I, Robot, or the accordion-armed Robot B9 in TV classic Lost in Space warning of danger on lonely planets. The real force driving the development of personal robots -- and what will eventually create demand for them in the marketplace -- is aging baby boomers. That's the secret among robotics researchers and budding robot companies. As the horde of boomers become old, they increasingly will be unable to care for themselves or their homes. They'll face a social and medical system straining to help them. But they'll be comfortable with technology. ... Robots that are likely to serve the elderly seem to fall into three broad categories. Though the categories don't officially have names, you could call them homebots, carebots and joybots. A look at those categories speaks volumes about what's going on in robotics -- and what's still beyond technology's reach. ... 'Whether or not you have to love your robot is another question,' Brooks says. 'I don't need my ATM to be cute.' Here is a great point of departure between U.S. and Japanese robotics research. U.S. labs and companies generally approach robots as tools. The Japanese approach them as beings. That explains a lot about robot projects coming out of Japan."
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Robots - Modern robots can respond to emotion and the smell of fine wines. By Sean Markey and Corey S. Powell. Discover Magazine (April 2, 2007).
Getting a Grip - Building the Ultimate Robotic Hand. By Gregory Mone. Wired (Issue 15.12; December 2007). "A 6-foot-tall, one-armed robot named Stair 1.0 balances on a modified Segway platform in the doorway of a Stanford University conference room. ... From his seat at a polished table, roboticist Morgan Quigley sends the bot on a mission. 'Stair, please fetch the stapler from the lab.' ... To do real work in our offices and homes, to fetch our staplers or clean up our rooms, robots are going to have to master their hands. They'll need the kind of 'hand-eye' coordination that enables them to identify targets, guide their mechanical mitts toward them, and then manipulate the objects deftly. There's a growing need for robots with these skills. In Japan, the elder care industry is already employing robots as assistants. To keep seniors out of costly nursing homes, though, they need to be able to perform household chores like serving up a drink. Even that simple task will entail plucking a glass out of a crowded cupboard, finding and removing a bottle from a fridge, and then pouring the beverage from one container into the other. And the bot needs to do all this without spilling, dropping, or breaking anything. ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett [Technology]. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before.† ... In a more spacious lab at the University of Massachusetts, UMan is going through a similar kind of basic training. Stair and UMan could be brothers: They look alike, use the same scanning lasers, and were both developed around a single hand built by Barrett. The UMan creators designed an algorithm that helps their robot figure out how to use that hand with objects it has never seen before. ... As Europe's preeminent robotics facility and one of the world's epicenters of artificial intelligence research, [University of Genoa's Laboratory for Integrated Advanced Robotics is] dominated by eggheads staring at monitors. And, of course, there's an android hanging around the place. The size and shape of a 3-year-old, RobotCub has two five-fingered hands,"
Meet the robots:
STAIR: STanford Artificial Intelligence Robot (Stanford University)
Uman (University of Massachusetts, Amherst campus)
RobotCub consortium
Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendant Mind. By Hans Moravec (1998). New York: Oxford University Press. An adventurous look at the future in which the author sees intelligent machines surpassing their human creators as the next evolutionary step. The author's web page includes an in-depth look at the book. You may also want to read the transcript of a November 1998 interview with Hans Moravec.
The Scientific Relevance of Robotics (Remarks at the Dedication of the CMU Robotics Institute). By Allen Newell. AI Magazine 2(1): 24-26, 34 (Winter 1980). "My first point, then, is to remind you that science doesn't fit any single mold. ... From where I stand, it is easy to see the science lurking in robotics. It lies in the welding of intelligence to energy. That is, it lies in intelligent perception and intelligent control of motion."
Emotionware. By Lynellen D.S. Perry (1996). ACM Crossroads Student Magazine. "The capability of displaying emotion seems to be a critical component of creating intelligent agents with whom humans can comfortably relate and communicate. The emotional aspect distinguishes a dead machine from an agent who is believable, alive, and trustworthy."
The Intimate Machine. Scientific American Frontiers (October 22, 2002). "Scientists blend technology with sociology to make our machines more fun to use."
The programmable robot of ancient Greece. By Noel Sharkey (Professor of artificial intelligence and robotics at the University of Sheffield, UK. His forthcoming book is called The Tin Man). New Scientist (July 7, 2007; Issue 2611: pages 32-35; subscription req'd). "Constructing a mechanical lion that could walk, let alone present flowers to the king, can't have been a simple task back in 1515 - even for a genius like Leonardo da Vinci. How he managed this feat remained a mystery until 2000, when US robotics expert Mark Rosheim came to a surprising conclusion. ... [W]as da Vinci influenced by an earlier design? And if so, how far back in history can we trace programmable robots? In search of answers I followed the technology back through medieval Europe to the Islamic world, where I have found evidence of an even earlier programmable automaton, made in Baghdad by the brilliant 13th-century engineer Ibn Ismail Ibn al-Razzaz Al-Jazari. ... Yet the trail doesn't stop there. It led me even further back past the automata of the Byzantine court and ancient Rome to ancient Alexandria. It was here that Hero, one of the greatest Greek engineers, constructed a programmable robot that pre-dates da Vinci's by 1500 years. ... So what exactly do we mean by 'programmable'? ..."
Robots and the Rest of Us. View by Bruce Sterling. Wired Magazine (May 2004; Issue 12.05). "Since when do machines need an ethical code? For 80 years, visionaries have imagined robots that look like us, work like us, perceive the world, judge it, and take action on their own. The robot butler is still as mystical as the flying car, but there's trouble rising in the garage. In Nobel's vaulted ballroom, experts uneasily point out that automatons are challenging humankind on four fronts. First, this is a time of war. ... The prospect of autonomous weapons naturally raises ethical questions. ... The second ominous frontier is brain augmentation, best embodied by the remote-controlled rat recently created at SUNY Downstate in Brooklyn. ... Another troubling frontier is physical, as opposed to mental, augmentation. ... Frontier number four is social: human reaction to the troubling presence of the humanoid. ... If the [First International Symposium on Roboethics] offers a take-home message, it's not about robots, but about us."
Be sure to also visit our Ethical & Social Implications page.
Machine learning on physical robots [slide show with audio]. By Peter Stone, The University of Texas at Austin. Presented at the University of Pennsylvania's GRASP Lab's GRASP Seminar Series (March 31, 2006). Abstract: "As robot technology advances, we are approaching the day when robots will be deployed prevalently in uncontrolled, unpredictable environments: the proverbial 'real world.' As this happens, it will be essential for these robots to be able to adapt autonomously to their changing environment. For a robot to learn to improve its performance based entirely on real-world environmental feedback, the robot's behavior specification and learning algorithm must be constructed so as to enable data-efficient learning. This talk presents 3 examples of machine learning on physical robots. ..."
Man and machine - Part 1: the quest for mechanical man. By Dheera Sujan. Radio Netherlands (November 26, 2004). "In her book Edison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life, Gaby Wood documents the long history of humanity's fascination with mechanical representations of itself. And she poses the question - what do we want from a machine that simulates us? 'Is it supposed to be as close as possible to a human being, or to improve on that, and become superhuman? In the quest for mechanical perfection, does perfection mean infallibility (as in the computer), or innocence (as in the child)?' These questions have been around since the Enlightenment and the dawn of the age of machines; now researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence are returning to them as they gain renewed relevance. ... At what pointpoint does a humanoid machine achieve personhood? Dr [Anne] Foerst's search for an answer to this question has led her through a philosophical maze that has forced her to examine her own ideas on what it means to be alive. ... Fear has always been part of the fascination we have for the idea of reproducing ourselves mechanically. According to Dr Foerst, however, that won't happen if we take responsibility for our creation. After all, Dr Frankenstein didn't create a monster; the creature (never dignified with a name) only became a monster when he was rejected by his creator and the rest of mankind." ‘’You can listen to the broadcast via a link on the page.’’
Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals. By Juyang Weng, James McClelland, Alex Pentland, Olaf Sporns, Ida Stockman, Mriganka Sur, Esther Thelen. (2000). , Science, Vol. 291, No. 5504; pages 599 - 600, 26 January 2001). "How does one create an intelligent machine? This problem has proven difficult. Over the past several decades, scientists have taken one of three approaches: In the first, which is knowledge-based, an intelligent machine in a laboratory is directly programmed to perform a given task. In a second, learning-based approach, a computer is 'spoon-fed' human-edited sensory data while the machine is controlled by a task-specific learning program. Finally, by a 'genetic search,' robots have evolved through generations by the principle of survival of the fittest, mostly in a computer-simulated virtual world. Although notable, none of these is powerful enough to lead to machines having the complex, diverse, and highly integrated capabilities of an adult brain, such as vision, speech, and language. Nevertheless, these traditional approaches have served as the incubator for the birth and growth of a new direction for machine intelligence: autonomous mental development."
Also see: Developmental Robotics - A 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium.
WTEC [World Technology Evaluation Center] Study on International Research and Development in Robotics. "The purpose of this study is to gather information on worldwide status and trends in robotics R&D and disseminate it to government decision-makers and the research community. The study panelists will gather information on robotics R&D abroad useful to the U.S. government in its own R&D programs, and to critically analyze and compare the research in the United States with that being pursued in Japan, Korea, and Europe."
Proceedings of the U.S. review workshop held at the National Science Foundation on July 21-22, 2004: Review of U.S. Research in Robotics. The 6 research areas addressed are:
Network Robotics; Multi-Robot Systems; Sensor Networks, Environmental
Medical Robotics; Biological Applications; Bio/Pharmaceutical ; Assisitive/Rehabilitative
Cognitive Human-Robot Interaction (CHRI); Physical HRI (PHRI); Humanoids; Entertainment; Personal/Service; Educational
Space; Field; Military Applications; Underwater; UAV
Actuators/Mechanisms; Bio/Nano/Mems; Industrial Applications
Perception (Sensing, Vision, Imaging); Control, Architecture, and Learning; Navigation/Mapping
Also see this exhibit from the National Science Foundation which complements the final report of September 16, 2005.
Meet Some Robots
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)